2014Journal of Northeastern UniversityRequires access

Common Theory's Misunderstanding in the Elements of Embezzlement

Chen Hong-bin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Common theory tends to misinterpret such embezzlement elements as the subject,the object and the way of act.Forgotten things include lost property,but should not be extended to cover occupations that are out of possession.Except forgotten things and buried things,the occupations out of possession can be interpreted asothers'property in commendam.The denotation ofduty abusein duty encroachment is narrower than that of corruption,and the ways of act do not include stealing and cheating,which should be defined as personal occupation of business-based property.The staff obtaining corporate property by stealing or cheating will be found theft or fraud.According to such articles as No.270,No.271and No.382in criminal law,an encroachment system with a successively aggravated legal punishment has been set up,which covers such crimes as out-of-possession occupation,business encroachment and official embezzlement.Possessing property entrusted is involved with the illegal identity,business-based property occupation is concerned with the responsibility identity,and owing property of public duty belongs to the identity of double responsibility.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Common theory tends to misinterpret such embezzlement elements as the subject,the object and the way of act.Forgotten things include lost property,but should not be extended to cover occupations that are out of possession.Except forgotten things and buried things,the occupations out of possession can be interpreted asothers'property in commendam.The denotation ofduty abusein duty encroachment is narrower than that of corruption,and the ways of act do not include stealing and cheating,which should be defined as personal occupation of business-based property.The staff obtaining corporate property by stealing or cheating will be found theft or fraud.According to such articles as No.270,No.271and No.382in criminal law,an encroachment system with a successively aggravated legal punishment has been set up,which covers such crimes as out-of-possession occupation,business encroachment and official embezzlement.Possessing property entrusted is involved with the illegal identity,business-based property occupation is concerned with the responsibility identity,and owing property of public duty belongs to the identity of double responsibility.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Common theory tends to misinterpret such embezzlement elements as the subject,the object and the way of act.Forgotten things include lost property,but should not be extended to cover occupations that are out of possession.Except forgotten things and buried things,the occupations out of possession can be interpreted asothers'property in commendam.The denotation ofduty abusein duty encroachment is narrower than that of corruption,and the ways of act do not include stealing and cheating,which should be defined as personal occupation of business-based property.The staff obtaining corporate property by stealing or cheating will be found theft or fraud.According to such articles as No.270,No.271and No.382in criminal law,an encroachment system with a successively aggravated legal punishment has been set up,which covers such crimes as out-of-possession occupation,business encroachment and official embezzlement.Possessing property entrusted is involved with the illegal identity,business-based property occupation is concerned with the responsibility identity,and owing property of public duty belongs to the identity of double responsibility.

Key concepts: Embezzlement, Possession (linguistics), Duty, Property (philosophy), Punishment (psychology), Public property, Cheating, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Common Theory's Misunderstanding in the Elements of Embezzlement — Research Paper | ScholarLens