2009•Zhongguo huxi yu weizhong jianhu zazhiRequires access

The Clinical Value of Pulse Pressure Variation to Monitor the Fluid Responsiveness and Effects of PEEP in Ventilated Patients with Acute Lung Injury

YU Jian-fen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To investigate whether pulse pressure variation(ΔPP) reflect the effects of PEEP and fluid resuscitation(FR) on hemodynamic effects.Methods Twenty critical patients with acute lung injury was ventilated with volume control(VT=8 mL/kg,Ti/Te=1:2),and PaCO2 was kept at 35 to 45 mm Hg.PEEP was setted as 5 cm H2O and 15 cm H2O in randomized order.Hemodynamic parameters including cardiac index,pulse pressure,central venous pressure,etc.were monitered by PiCCO system.Measurements were performed after the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP(PEEP5 group)and 15 cm H2O PEEP(PEEP15 group) respectively.When the PEEP-induced decrease in cardiac index(CI) was 10%,measurements were also performed after fluid resuscitation.Results Compared with PEEP5 group,CI was decreased significantly in PEEP15 group(P0.05),and ΔPP was increased significantly(P0.05).In 14 patients whose PEEP-induced decrease in CI was 10%,fluid resuscitation increased CI from(3.01±0.57)L·min-1·m-2 to(3.62±0.68)L·min-1·m-2(P0.01),and decreased ΔPP from(17±3)% to(10±2)%(P0.01).PEEP15-induced decrease in CI was correlated negatively with ΔPP on PEEP5(r=-0.91,P0.01) and with the PEEP15-induced increase in ΔPP(r=-0.79,P0.01).FR-induced changes in CI correlated with ΔPP before FR(r=0.96,P0.01) and with the FR-induced decrease in ΔPP(r=-0.95,P0.01).Conclusions In ventilated patients with ALI,ΔPP may be a simple and useful parameter in predicting and assessing the hemodynamic effects of PEEP and FR.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To investigate whether pulse pressure variation(ΔPP) reflect the effects of PEEP and fluid resuscitation(FR) on hemodynamic effects.Methods Twenty critical patients with acute lung injury was ventilated with volume control(VT=8 mL/kg,Ti/Te=1:2),and PaCO2 was kept at 35 to 45 mm Hg.PEEP was setted as 5 cm H2O and 15 cm H2O in randomized order.Hemodynamic parameters including cardiac index,pulse pressure,central venous pressure,etc.were monitered by PiCCO system.Measurements were performed after the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP(PEEP5 group)and 15 cm H2O PEEP(PEEP15 group) respectively.When the PEEP-induced decrease in cardiac index(CI) was 10%,measurements were also performed after fluid resuscitation.Results Compared with PEEP5 group,CI was decreased significantly in PEEP15 group(P0.05),and ΔPP was increased significantly(P0.05).In 14 patients whose PEEP-induced decrease in CI was 10%,fluid resuscitation increased CI from(3.01±0.57)L·min-1·m-2 to(3.62±0.68)L·min-1·m-2(P0.01),and decreased ΔPP from(17±3)% to(10±2)%(P0.01).PEEP15-induced decrease in CI was correlated negatively with ΔPP on PEEP5(r=-0.91,P0.01) and with the PEEP15-induced increase in ΔPP(r=-0.79,P0.01).FR-induced changes in CI correlated with ΔPP before FR(r=0.96,P0.01) and with the FR-induced decrease in ΔPP(r=-0.95,P0.01).Conclusions In ventilated patients with ALI,ΔPP may be a simple and useful parameter in predicting and assessing the hemodynamic effects of PEEP and FR.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To investigate whether pulse pressure variation(ΔPP) reflect the effects of PEEP and fluid resuscitation(FR) on hemodynamic effects.Methods Twenty critical patients with acute lung injury was ventilated with volume control(VT=8 mL/kg,Ti/Te=1:2),and PaCO2 was kept at 35 to 45 mm Hg.PEEP was setted as 5 cm H2O and 15 cm H2O in randomized order.Hemodynamic parameters including cardiac index,pulse pressure,central venous pressure,etc.were monitered by PiCCO system.Measurements were performed after the application of 5 cm H2O PEEP(PEEP5 group)and 15 cm H2O PEEP(PEEP15 group) respectively.When the PEEP-induced decrease in cardiac index(CI) was 10%,measurements were also performed after fluid resuscitation.Results Compared with PEEP5 group,CI was decreased significantly in PEEP15 group(P0.05),and ΔPP was increased significantly(P0.05).In 14 patients whose PEEP-induced decrease in CI was 10%,fluid resuscitation increased CI from(3.01±0.57)L·min-1·m-2 to(3.62±0.68)L·min-1·m-2(P0.01),and decreased ΔPP from(17±3)% to(10±2)%(P0.01).PEEP15-induced decrease in CI was correlated negatively with ΔPP on PEEP5(r=-0.91,P0.01) and with the PEEP15-induced increase in ΔPP(r=-0.79,P0.01).FR-induced changes in CI correlated with ΔPP before FR(r=0.96,P0.01) and with the FR-induced decrease in ΔPP(r=-0.95,P0.01).Conclusions In ventilated patients with ALI,ΔPP may be a simple and useful parameter in predicting and assessing the hemodynamic effects of PEEP and FR.

Key concepts: Medicine, Resuscitation, Pulse pressure, Hemodynamics, Cardiac index, Anesthesia, Positive end-expiratory pressure, Cardiac output

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Clinical Value of Pulse Pressure Variation to Monitor the Fluid Responsiveness and Effects of PEEP in Ventilated Patients with Acute Lung Injury — Research Paper | ScholarLens