2011Xi'nan nongye xuebaoRequires access

Response to Different Levels of Low Light Stress of Two Varieties of Tomatos

Chao Li

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Two tomato varieties of 'Liaoyuanduoli' and 'moneymaker' were used in the experiment,in order to indicate the response to different levels of low light stress of two varieties of tomatoes in greenhouse.The results indicated that with light intensity decreasing,the specific leaf area and chlorophyll a and b of two varieties increased,and the lower of light,the more increase was obvious.As a result,under low light,leaf areas of plants increased and leaves became thinner.The leaf area and content of chlorophyll a and b of 'Liaoyuanduoli' increased obviously compared to that of 'moneymaker'.With the light intensity decreasing,intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci) increased with the net photosynthetic rate(Pn) and the stomata conductance(Gs) decreasing,and the starch and the carbohydrates content in leaves decreased.All of these suggested that response to different levels of low light stress of two varieties of tomatoes were similar.The tolerant to low light of 'Liaoyuanduoli' was obviously better than that of 'moneymaker'.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Two tomato varieties of 'Liaoyuanduoli' and 'moneymaker' were used in the experiment,in order to indicate the response to different levels of low light stress of two varieties of tomatoes in greenhouse.The results indicated that with light intensity decreasing,the specific leaf area and chlorophyll a and b of two varieties increased,and the lower of light,the more increase was obvious.As a result,under low light,leaf areas of plants increased and leaves became thinner.The leaf area and content of chlorophyll a and b of 'Liaoyuanduoli' increased obviously compared to that of 'moneymaker'.With the light intensity decreasing,intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci) increased with the net photosynthetic rate(Pn) and the stomata conductance(Gs) decreasing,and the starch and the carbohydrates content in leaves decreased.All of these suggested that response to different levels of low light stress of two varieties of tomatoes were similar.The tolerant to low light of 'Liaoyuanduoli' was obviously better than that of 'moneymaker'.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Two tomato varieties of 'Liaoyuanduoli' and 'moneymaker' were used in the experiment,in order to indicate the response to different levels of low light stress of two varieties of tomatoes in greenhouse.The results indicated that with light intensity decreasing,the specific leaf area and chlorophyll a and b of two varieties increased,and the lower of light,the more increase was obvious.As a result,under low light,leaf areas of plants increased and leaves became thinner.The leaf area and content of chlorophyll a and b of 'Liaoyuanduoli' increased obviously compared to that of 'moneymaker'.With the light intensity decreasing,intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci) increased with the net photosynthetic rate(Pn) and the stomata conductance(Gs) decreasing,and the starch and the carbohydrates content in leaves decreased.All of these suggested that response to different levels of low light stress of two varieties of tomatoes were similar.The tolerant to low light of 'Liaoyuanduoli' was obviously better than that of 'moneymaker'.

Key concepts: Light intensity, Photosynthesis, Chlorophyll, Starch, Horticulture, Biology, Greenhouse, Agronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Response to Different Levels of Low Light Stress of Two Varieties of Tomatos — Research Paper | ScholarLens