2007•Zhiwu ziyuan yu huanjingRequires access

Selection of morphological features for identification of Cynodon dactylon and C. transvaalensis

Xuejun Yuan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Thirteen morphological features of ten provenances of Cynodon dactylon(L.) Pers.and two provenances of C.transvaalensis Burtt-Davy were analyzed and compared.The results showed that compared to C.dactylon,the leaf width of C.transvaalensis was narrower,inflorescence number was fewer,internode diameter was thinner,and its inflorescence length was shorter while spikelet longth was longer.There were significant differences in above five indexes between C.dactylon and C.transvaalensis.In addition,leaf,stolon and style color of C.transvaalensis was significant difference to that of C.dactylon.Therefore,the eight morphological features of leaf width,internode diameter,inflorescence number,inflorescence and spikelet length,and color of leaf,stolon and style,can be used as morphological indexes to distinguish this two species.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Thirteen morphological features of ten provenances of Cynodon dactylon(L.) Pers.and two provenances of C.transvaalensis Burtt-Davy were analyzed and compared.The results showed that compared to C.dactylon,the leaf width of C.transvaalensis was narrower,inflorescence number was fewer,internode diameter was thinner,and its inflorescence length was shorter while spikelet longth was longer.There were significant differences in above five indexes between C.dactylon and C.transvaalensis.In addition,leaf,stolon and style color of C.transvaalensis was significant difference to that of C.dactylon.Therefore,the eight morphological features of leaf width,internode diameter,inflorescence number,inflorescence and spikelet length,and color of leaf,stolon and style,can be used as morphological indexes to distinguish this two species.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Thirteen morphological features of ten provenances of Cynodon dactylon(L.) Pers.and two provenances of C.transvaalensis Burtt-Davy were analyzed and compared.The results showed that compared to C.dactylon,the leaf width of C.transvaalensis was narrower,inflorescence number was fewer,internode diameter was thinner,and its inflorescence length was shorter while spikelet longth was longer.There were significant differences in above five indexes between C.dactylon and C.transvaalensis.In addition,leaf,stolon and style color of C.transvaalensis was significant difference to that of C.dactylon.Therefore,the eight morphological features of leaf width,internode diameter,inflorescence number,inflorescence and spikelet length,and color of leaf,stolon and style,can be used as morphological indexes to distinguish this two species.

Key concepts: Cynodon dactylon, Inflorescence, Stolon, Biology, Botany, Horticulture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Selection of morphological features for identification of Cynodon dactylon and C. transvaalensis — Research Paper | ScholarLens