2011WaiguoyuRequires access

On the Complementarity of Cognitive Grammar and Construction Grammar on Argument Structure Research

Yi Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

As a key issue in theoretical linguistics,argument structure attracts a great deal of attention from Cognitive Grammar and Construction Grammar.Cognitive Grammar,which emphasizes the encyclopedic nature of meaning,construes the semantic base by means of independently motivated cognitive methods.It can provide important insights for the study of constructional motivations as well as the fusion between the verb and the construction in Construction Grammar.Construction Grammar,on the other hand,stresses the top-down approach in the study of argument structure,and calls for Cognitive Grammar to attach more significance to the representation of constructional meaning.These two theoretical frameworks,despite their different focuses,can be unified and become mutually complementary.In this way,they can achieve more explanatory power for argument structure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As a key issue in theoretical linguistics,argument structure attracts a great deal of attention from Cognitive Grammar and Construction Grammar.Cognitive Grammar,which emphasizes the encyclopedic nature of meaning,construes the semantic base by means of independently motivated cognitive methods.It can provide important insights for the study of constructional motivations as well as the fusion between the verb and the construction in Construction Grammar.Construction Grammar,on the other hand,stresses the top-down approach in the study of argument structure,and calls for Cognitive Grammar to attach more significance to the representation of constructional meaning.These two theoretical frameworks,despite their different focuses,can be unified and become mutually complementary.In this way,they can achieve more explanatory power for argument structure.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As a key issue in theoretical linguistics,argument structure attracts a great deal of attention from Cognitive Grammar and Construction Grammar.Cognitive Grammar,which emphasizes the encyclopedic nature of meaning,construes the semantic base by means of independently motivated cognitive methods.It can provide important insights for the study of constructional motivations as well as the fusion between the verb and the construction in Construction Grammar.Construction Grammar,on the other hand,stresses the top-down approach in the study of argument structure,and calls for Cognitive Grammar to attach more significance to the representation of constructional meaning.These two theoretical frameworks,despite their different focuses,can be unified and become mutually complementary.In this way,they can achieve more explanatory power for argument structure.

Key concepts: Construction grammar, Emergent grammar, Linguistics, Argument (complex analysis), Grammar, Cognitive grammar, Complementarity (molecular biology), Relational grammar

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Complementarity of Cognitive Grammar and Construction Grammar on Argument Structure Research — Research Paper | ScholarLens