2011Shiyong yixue zazhiRequires access

The value of rescue ICSI versus that of direct ICSI following fertilization failure in conventional IVF

LV Jie-qian

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To explore the clinical value of rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection(Rescue ICSI) following fertilization failure in conventional IVF.Methods 29 rescue ICSI cycles following total fertilization failure in conventional IVF(groupⅠ) and 70 direct ICSI cycles(groupⅡ) were performed in our hospital between June 2009 and December 2009.The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.Results The normal fertilization rate,high-quality embryo rate,and clinical pregnancy rate did not differ significantly between the two groups [(80.8 ± 16.2)% vs.(82.9 ± 15.9)%,(76.6 ± 24.6)% vs.(72.7 ± 24.4)%,and 37.9% vs.41.4%;P 0.05].There was a significant difference in the cleavage embryo rate between rescue ICSI than direct ICSI [(91.7 ± 13.6)% vs.(97.4 ± 6.8)%,P 0.05].Conclusions Rescue ICSI may improve the fertilization rate and clinical outcomes.It can be performed after fertilization failure in conventional IVF.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To explore the clinical value of rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection(Rescue ICSI) following fertilization failure in conventional IVF.Methods 29 rescue ICSI cycles following total fertilization failure in conventional IVF(groupⅠ) and 70 direct ICSI cycles(groupⅡ) were performed in our hospital between June 2009 and December 2009.The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.Results The normal fertilization rate,high-quality embryo rate,and clinical pregnancy rate did not differ significantly between the two groups [(80.8 ± 16.2)% vs.(82.9 ± 15.9)%,(76.6 ± 24.6)% vs.(72.7 ± 24.4)%,and 37.9% vs.41.4%;P 0.05].There was a significant difference in the cleavage embryo rate between rescue ICSI than direct ICSI [(91.7 ± 13.6)% vs.(97.4 ± 6.8)%,P 0.05].Conclusions Rescue ICSI may improve the fertilization rate and clinical outcomes.It can be performed after fertilization failure in conventional IVF.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To explore the clinical value of rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection(Rescue ICSI) following fertilization failure in conventional IVF.Methods 29 rescue ICSI cycles following total fertilization failure in conventional IVF(groupⅠ) and 70 direct ICSI cycles(groupⅡ) were performed in our hospital between June 2009 and December 2009.The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.Results The normal fertilization rate,high-quality embryo rate,and clinical pregnancy rate did not differ significantly between the two groups [(80.8 ± 16.2)% vs.(82.9 ± 15.9)%,(76.6 ± 24.6)% vs.(72.7 ± 24.4)%,and 37.9% vs.41.4%;P 0.05].There was a significant difference in the cleavage embryo rate between rescue ICSI than direct ICSI [(91.7 ± 13.6)% vs.(97.4 ± 6.8)%,P 0.05].Conclusions Rescue ICSI may improve the fertilization rate and clinical outcomes.It can be performed after fertilization failure in conventional IVF.

Key concepts: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Human fertilization, Medicine, Andrology, Gynecology, In vitro fertilisation, Obstetrics, Embryo

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The value of rescue ICSI versus that of direct ICSI following fertilization failure in conventional IVF — Research Paper | ScholarLens