The value of rescue ICSI versus that of direct ICSI following fertilization failure in conventional IVF
LV Jie-qian
Abstract
LV Jie-qian
Abstract
Objective To explore the clinical value of rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection(Rescue ICSI) following fertilization failure in conventional IVF.Methods 29 rescue ICSI cycles following total fertilization failure in conventional IVF(groupⅠ) and 70 direct ICSI cycles(groupⅡ) were performed in our hospital between June 2009 and December 2009.The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.Results The normal fertilization rate,high-quality embryo rate,and clinical pregnancy rate did not differ significantly between the two groups [(80.8 ± 16.2)% vs.(82.9 ± 15.9)%,(76.6 ± 24.6)% vs.(72.7 ± 24.4)%,and 37.9% vs.41.4%;P 0.05].There was a significant difference in the cleavage embryo rate between rescue ICSI than direct ICSI [(91.7 ± 13.6)% vs.(97.4 ± 6.8)%,P 0.05].Conclusions Rescue ICSI may improve the fertilization rate and clinical outcomes.It can be performed after fertilization failure in conventional IVF.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To explore the clinical value of rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection(Rescue ICSI) following fertilization failure in conventional IVF.Methods 29 rescue ICSI cycles following total fertilization failure in conventional IVF(groupⅠ) and 70 direct ICSI cycles(groupⅡ) were performed in our hospital between June 2009 and December 2009.The clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups.Results The normal fertilization rate,high-quality embryo rate,and clinical pregnancy rate did not differ significantly between the two groups [(80.8 ± 16.2)% vs.(82.9 ± 15.9)%,(76.6 ± 24.6)% vs.(72.7 ± 24.4)%,and 37.9% vs.41.4%;P 0.05].There was a significant difference in the cleavage embryo rate between rescue ICSI than direct ICSI [(91.7 ± 13.6)% vs.(97.4 ± 6.8)%,P 0.05].Conclusions Rescue ICSI may improve the fertilization rate and clinical outcomes.It can be performed after fertilization failure in conventional IVF.
Key concepts: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, Human fertilization, Medicine, Andrology, Gynecology, In vitro fertilisation, Obstetrics, Embryo