Evaluation on impact of iDose~4 on dose reduction and image quality of low dose contrast-enhance chest CT
Jiang Song
Abstract
Jiang Song
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using iterative reconstruction(IR) algorithm(iDose4) in low dose contrast-enhanced chest CT.Methods Seventy-one patients with normal body mass index(BMI,18.5—25.0 kg/m2) underwent contrast-enhanced chest CT.The patients were randomly assigned into 3 groups: group A,120 kVp/100 mAs;group B,80 kVp/100 mAs;group C,120 kVp/50 mAs.All images were reconstructed using conventional filtered back projection(FBP) and IR.The mean image noise,SNR,CNR and effective dose(ED) with each protocol were assessed.Image quality were graded(scale: 1—3) and compared among 3 groups.Results For the same patient,IR significantly decreased the mean image noise,improved SNR and CNR compared with FBP.The mean image noise,SNR and CNR using IR in group B and C were improved or comparable to those in group A using FBP(all P0.05).No significant difference was found in subjective image quality between groups B and C using IR,nor with group A using FBP(P0.05).Conclusion It is feasible to obtain images qualified for diagnosis using IR in low dose contrast-enhanced chest CT examination.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To evaluate the feasibility of using iterative reconstruction(IR) algorithm(iDose4) in low dose contrast-enhanced chest CT.Methods Seventy-one patients with normal body mass index(BMI,18.5—25.0 kg/m2) underwent contrast-enhanced chest CT.The patients were randomly assigned into 3 groups: group A,120 kVp/100 mAs;group B,80 kVp/100 mAs;group C,120 kVp/50 mAs.All images were reconstructed using conventional filtered back projection(FBP) and IR.The mean image noise,SNR,CNR and effective dose(ED) with each protocol were assessed.Image quality were graded(scale: 1—3) and compared among 3 groups.Results For the same patient,IR significantly decreased the mean image noise,improved SNR and CNR compared with FBP.The mean image noise,SNR and CNR using IR in group B and C were improved or comparable to those in group A using FBP(all P0.05).No significant difference was found in subjective image quality between groups B and C using IR,nor with group A using FBP(P0.05).Conclusion It is feasible to obtain images qualified for diagnosis using IR in low dose contrast-enhanced chest CT examination.
Key concepts: Medicine, Image quality, Nuclear medicine, Image noise, Iterative reconstruction, Contrast (vision), Contrast-to-noise ratio, Effective dose (radiation)