2009Academic Journal of Second Military Medical UniversityRequires access

Differentiation of cryopreserved bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells into endothelial progenitor cells

Lin Fang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the functions of endothelial progenitor cells(EPCs) differentiated from cryopreserved and fresh bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells(MNCs).Methods: The bone marrow samples were taken from swine iliac bones.The isolated MNCs were cultured or cryopreserved at-80℃ for 3 months and then cultured again.The P1-EPCs were identifed by Dil-ac-LDL and FITC-UEA-1 double staining,immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry.The EPC pick-up rate,migration,adhesion,and proliferation abilities were compared between the cryopreserved group and the fresh group.Results: Immunohistochemisty showed that the P1-EPCs of the cryopreserved group were positive for CD133(+),CD34(+),CD31() and KDR();flow cytometry also showed they were positive for CD133([17.24±3.12]%),CD34([37.21±10.85]%),CD31([72.07±13.34]%) and KDR([89.09±16.40]%).There were no significant differences in the pick-up rates([1.1±0.078]% vs [1.03±0.061]%,P=0.054),migration rates([15±0.71]% vs [14.2±0.63]%,P=0.17),adherence rates([42.7±2.1]% vs [39.5±1.7]%,P=0.11),and proliferation abilities([25.06±2.82]×104 vs [21.64±2.34]×104,P=0.089) between EPCs of the fresh and cryopreserved groups.Conclusion: Cryopreservation has no measurable influence on the numbers and functions of EPCs differentiated from bone marrow-derived MNCs,so cryopreservation can be used to obtain sufficient homogeneous EPCs in a short period for therapy using EPCs transplantation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the functions of endothelial progenitor cells(EPCs) differentiated from cryopreserved and fresh bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells(MNCs).Methods: The bone marrow samples were taken from swine iliac bones.The isolated MNCs were cultured or cryopreserved at-80℃ for 3 months and then cultured again.The P1-EPCs were identifed by Dil-ac-LDL and FITC-UEA-1 double staining,immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry.The EPC pick-up rate,migration,adhesion,and proliferation abilities were compared between the cryopreserved group and the fresh group.Results: Immunohistochemisty showed that the P1-EPCs of the cryopreserved group were positive for CD133(+),CD34(+),CD31() and KDR();flow cytometry also showed they were positive for CD133([17.24±3.12]%),CD34([37.21±10.85]%),CD31([72.07±13.34]%) and KDR([89.09±16.40]%).There were no significant differences in the pick-up rates([1.1±0.078]% vs [1.03±0.061]%,P=0.054),migration rates([15±0.71]% vs [14.2±0.63]%,P=0.17),adherence rates([42.7±2.1]% vs [39.5±1.7]%,P=0.11),and proliferation abilities([25.06±2.82]×104 vs [21.64±2.34]×104,P=0.089) between EPCs of the fresh and cryopreserved groups.Conclusion: Cryopreservation has no measurable influence on the numbers and functions of EPCs differentiated from bone marrow-derived MNCs,so cryopreservation can be used to obtain sufficient homogeneous EPCs in a short period for therapy using EPCs transplantation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the functions of endothelial progenitor cells(EPCs) differentiated from cryopreserved and fresh bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells(MNCs).Methods: The bone marrow samples were taken from swine iliac bones.The isolated MNCs were cultured or cryopreserved at-80℃ for 3 months and then cultured again.The P1-EPCs were identifed by Dil-ac-LDL and FITC-UEA-1 double staining,immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry.The EPC pick-up rate,migration,adhesion,and proliferation abilities were compared between the cryopreserved group and the fresh group.Results: Immunohistochemisty showed that the P1-EPCs of the cryopreserved group were positive for CD133(+),CD34(+),CD31() and KDR();flow cytometry also showed they were positive for CD133([17.24±3.12]%),CD34([37.21±10.85]%),CD31([72.07±13.34]%) and KDR([89.09±16.40]%).There were no significant differences in the pick-up rates([1.1±0.078]% vs [1.03±0.061]%,P=0.054),migration rates([15±0.71]% vs [14.2±0.63]%,P=0.17),adherence rates([42.7±2.1]% vs [39.5±1.7]%,P=0.11),and proliferation abilities([25.06±2.82]×104 vs [21.64±2.34]×104,P=0.089) between EPCs of the fresh and cryopreserved groups.Conclusion: Cryopreservation has no measurable influence on the numbers and functions of EPCs differentiated from bone marrow-derived MNCs,so cryopreservation can be used to obtain sufficient homogeneous EPCs in a short period for therapy using EPCs transplantation.

Key concepts: Cryopreservation, CD31, CD34, Andrology, Peripheral blood mononuclear cell, Progenitor cell, Flow cytometry, Bone marrow

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Differentiation of cryopreserved bone marrow-derived mononuclear cells into endothelial progenitor cells — Research Paper | ScholarLens