2004Yaredai zhiwu kexueRequires access

Early evaluation on fast-growth and stability of introduced Pinus taeda families

Sun Xiaoxia, Liang Yi-chi, Ruan Shaoning

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In comparison with slash pine, which was introduced earlier from abroad, and the native mason pine, the five-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) families, which was introduced into Fujian Province, were evaluated. The results indicated that there were significant or great significant differences in families, gene and site mutual variance. Loblolly pine grew more quickly than slash pine and mason pine. By synthesizing clustering analysis, 25 loblolly pine families were divided into 4 groups, i. e. best, better, moderate and poor. Compared to mason pine, the actual gains of loblolly pine families were 83.2%, 63.4%, 48.5% and 33.7%, respectively. Using gene grouping means to evaluate the fast-growth and stability of loblolly pine families, No. 19, 25, 18, 21 and 10 families had superior gene type, which grew fast and varied little.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In comparison with slash pine, which was introduced earlier from abroad, and the native mason pine, the five-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) families, which was introduced into Fujian Province, were evaluated. The results indicated that there were significant or great significant differences in families, gene and site mutual variance. Loblolly pine grew more quickly than slash pine and mason pine. By synthesizing clustering analysis, 25 loblolly pine families were divided into 4 groups, i. e. best, better, moderate and poor. Compared to mason pine, the actual gains of loblolly pine families were 83.2%, 63.4%, 48.5% and 33.7%, respectively. Using gene grouping means to evaluate the fast-growth and stability of loblolly pine families, No. 19, 25, 18, 21 and 10 families had superior gene type, which grew fast and varied little.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In comparison with slash pine, which was introduced earlier from abroad, and the native mason pine, the five-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) families, which was introduced into Fujian Province, were evaluated. The results indicated that there were significant or great significant differences in families, gene and site mutual variance. Loblolly pine grew more quickly than slash pine and mason pine. By synthesizing clustering analysis, 25 loblolly pine families were divided into 4 groups, i. e. best, better, moderate and poor. Compared to mason pine, the actual gains of loblolly pine families were 83.2%, 63.4%, 48.5% and 33.7%, respectively. Using gene grouping means to evaluate the fast-growth and stability of loblolly pine families, No. 19, 25, 18, 21 and 10 families had superior gene type, which grew fast and varied little.

Key concepts: Loblolly pine, Slash Pine, Pinus <genus>, Slash (logging), Biology, Forestry, Pinus tabulaeformis, Botany

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Early evaluation on fast-growth and stability of introduced Pinus taeda families — Research Paper | ScholarLens