2010•China Practical MedicineRequires access

Compared UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer with microscopy results of urine sediment in the cast

Shu Xiao-chu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the sensitivity and its influencing factors of UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer and urine sediment microscopic examination in urine casts.Methods 1226 cases of patients with UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer were analyzed urine sediment and microscopic examination of urine sediment in the cast.Results UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer,urine cast positive rate was 12.9%,36.8% sensitivity and specificity of 95.2%,false positive rate of 3.6% false negative rate of 16.0% compliance rate of 80.4%,positive predictive value of 72.2% negative predictive value 81.6% ;urine sediment microscopic examination of urine in the cast-positive rate was 25.3%.Conclusion UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer,urine tube there are more false negative and false positive,the combination of microscopic examination of urine sediment can increase the accuracy of detection tube.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the sensitivity and its influencing factors of UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer and urine sediment microscopic examination in urine casts.Methods 1226 cases of patients with UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer were analyzed urine sediment and microscopic examination of urine sediment in the cast.Results UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer,urine cast positive rate was 12.9%,36.8% sensitivity and specificity of 95.2%,false positive rate of 3.6% false negative rate of 16.0% compliance rate of 80.4%,positive predictive value of 72.2% negative predictive value 81.6% ;urine sediment microscopic examination of urine in the cast-positive rate was 25.3%.Conclusion UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer,urine tube there are more false negative and false positive,the combination of microscopic examination of urine sediment can increase the accuracy of detection tube.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the sensitivity and its influencing factors of UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer and urine sediment microscopic examination in urine casts.Methods 1226 cases of patients with UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer were analyzed urine sediment and microscopic examination of urine sediment in the cast.Results UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer,urine cast positive rate was 12.9%,36.8% sensitivity and specificity of 95.2%,false positive rate of 3.6% false negative rate of 16.0% compliance rate of 80.4%,positive predictive value of 72.2% negative predictive value 81.6% ;urine sediment microscopic examination of urine in the cast-positive rate was 25.3%.Conclusion UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer,urine tube there are more false negative and false positive,the combination of microscopic examination of urine sediment can increase the accuracy of detection tube.

Key concepts: Urinalysis, Urine, Medicine, Spectrum analyzer, False positive rate, Urinary sediment, Chromatography, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Compared UF-500i automated urinalysis analyzer with microscopy results of urine sediment in the cast — Research Paper | ScholarLens