2010•Unpublished venueRequires access

Zhdanov and Zhu Quang-qian's Aesthetics: Re-Reading The History of Aesthetics in the West

Xia Zhong-yi

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Zhu Guang-qian seldom mentioned Zhdanov in his writing,but the relationship of Zhdanovism and Zhu was a crucial viewpoint of researching Zhu's aesthetics after 1949.The relationship was like a many-act play: firstly Zhu self-critiqued through Zhdanovism;secondly Zhu critiqued others through Zhdanovism.When Zhu wrote the chapter of the naturalism of Russia in The History of Aesthetics in the West,he alienated Zhdanovism stealthily,which is the climax of this many-act play.It was the complicated relationship of Zhdanovism and Zhu that reflected the conflicts and hesitations of Zhu in the background of discourse in 1950's -1960's China.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Zhu Guang-qian seldom mentioned Zhdanov in his writing,but the relationship of Zhdanovism and Zhu was a crucial viewpoint of researching Zhu's aesthetics after 1949.The relationship was like a many-act play: firstly Zhu self-critiqued through Zhdanovism;secondly Zhu critiqued others through Zhdanovism.When Zhu wrote the chapter of the naturalism of Russia in The History of Aesthetics in the West,he alienated Zhdanovism stealthily,which is the climax of this many-act play.It was the complicated relationship of Zhdanovism and Zhu that reflected the conflicts and hesitations of Zhu in the background of discourse in 1950's -1960's China.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Zhu Guang-qian seldom mentioned Zhdanov in his writing,but the relationship of Zhdanovism and Zhu was a crucial viewpoint of researching Zhu's aesthetics after 1949.The relationship was like a many-act play: firstly Zhu self-critiqued through Zhdanovism;secondly Zhu critiqued others through Zhdanovism.When Zhu wrote the chapter of the naturalism of Russia in The History of Aesthetics in the West,he alienated Zhdanovism stealthily,which is the climax of this many-act play.It was the complicated relationship of Zhdanovism and Zhu that reflected the conflicts and hesitations of Zhu in the background of discourse in 1950's -1960's China.

Key concepts: Naturalism, Aesthetics, Philosophy, Reading (process), China, Epistemology, History, Archaeology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Zhdanov and Zhu Quang-qian's Aesthetics: Re-Reading The History of Aesthetics in the West — Research Paper | ScholarLens