[Comparison of HLA class I typing by serology with DNA typing].
Tan J, Xiaoping Tang, Tingting Xie
Abstract
Tan J, Xiaoping Tang, Tingting Xie
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare HLA class I typing by serology with PCR-SSP method in the Chinese population. METHODS: HLA-A and -B antigens were typed by serology with microlymphocytotoxicity and DNA typing with PCR-SSP in 525 clinical samples. Reliability, reproducibility and clinical practicability of both methods were compared according to the typing results. RESULTS: Serological typing for HLA class I was rapid and simple, costing 3 hours. The discrepancy rate between serology and PCR-SSP for HLA-A antigen was 9.0%, consisting of 21 antigens being incorrectly interpreted by serology and 26 of serological "blanks" turning out to be definable alleles by DNA typing. The discrepancy rate for HLA-B antigen was 12.2%, containing 39 antigens being incorrectly interpreted and 35 of serological "blanks" turning out to be definable alleles by PCR-SSP typing. DNA typing for HLA class I by PCR-SSP proved to be an accurate, reliable and well-reproducible technique within 5 hours. While it was difficult to suit clinical assay by a large scale screening because of complicated operation and high technical condition. CONCLUSION: DNA typing for HLA class I by PCR-SSP is suitable for clinical application in the Chinese population with a higher precision than serology. Screening test by serology is recommended. Ambiguous or blank antigens by serology should be retyped by DNA typing.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE: To compare HLA class I typing by serology with PCR-SSP method in the Chinese population. METHODS: HLA-A and -B antigens were typed by serology with microlymphocytotoxicity and DNA typing with PCR-SSP in 525 clinical samples. Reliability, reproducibility and clinical practicability of both methods were compared according to the typing results. RESULTS: Serological typing for HLA class I was rapid and simple, costing 3 hours. The discrepancy rate between serology and PCR-SSP for HLA-A antigen was 9.0%, consisting of 21 antigens being incorrectly interpreted by serology and 26 of serological "blanks" turning out to be definable alleles by DNA typing. The discrepancy rate for HLA-B antigen was 12.2%, containing 39 antigens being incorrectly interpreted and 35 of serological "blanks" turning out to be definable alleles by PCR-SSP typing. DNA typing for HLA class I by PCR-SSP proved to be an accurate, reliable and well-reproducible technique within 5 hours. While it was difficult to suit clinical assay by a large scale screening because of complicated operation and high technical condition. CONCLUSION: DNA typing for HLA class I by PCR-SSP is suitable for clinical application in the Chinese population with a higher precision than serology. Screening test by serology is recommended. Ambiguous or blank antigens by serology should be retyped by DNA typing.
Key concepts: Typing, Serology, Human leukocyte antigen, Population, Antigen, Polymerase chain reaction, Biology, Genetics