2010•Yunnan Daxue xuebao. Shehui kexue banRequires access

Discourse Practice and Radical Politics:From Foucault to Post-Marxism

Zhu Yan-min

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

One important source of the discourse practice of Laclau and Mouffe's Post-Marxism is Foucault's discussion of both discourse and discourse practice in The Archaeology of Knowledge.On the one hand,they both have inherited Foucault's concept of discursive formations and denounced a priori unity of discourse,regarding discourse practice as a connecting practice in a discursive space of difference;on the other they both have criticized Foucault's distinction between discourse and non-discourse,regarding this distinction a distinction within discourse and viewing the whole social life as a discourse space.If Foucault has his duality concerning the relationship between discourse practice and politics,namely,discourse is both against and for power,Post-Marxism has combined discourse practice with radical plural democracy,which helps revive the European Leftists for realizing their revolutionary missions though at the price of uncertainty.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

One important source of the discourse practice of Laclau and Mouffe's Post-Marxism is Foucault's discussion of both discourse and discourse practice in The Archaeology of Knowledge.On the one hand,they both have inherited Foucault's concept of discursive formations and denounced a priori unity of discourse,regarding discourse practice as a connecting practice in a discursive space of difference;on the other they both have criticized Foucault's distinction between discourse and non-discourse,regarding this distinction a distinction within discourse and viewing the whole social life as a discourse space.If Foucault has his duality concerning the relationship between discourse practice and politics,namely,discourse is both against and for power,Post-Marxism has combined discourse practice with radical plural democracy,which helps revive the European Leftists for realizing their revolutionary missions though at the price of uncertainty.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

One important source of the discourse practice of Laclau and Mouffe's Post-Marxism is Foucault's discussion of both discourse and discourse practice in The Archaeology of Knowledge.On the one hand,they both have inherited Foucault's concept of discursive formations and denounced a priori unity of discourse,regarding discourse practice as a connecting practice in a discursive space of difference;on the other they both have criticized Foucault's distinction between discourse and non-discourse,regarding this distinction a distinction within discourse and viewing the whole social life as a discourse space.If Foucault has his duality concerning the relationship between discourse practice and politics,namely,discourse is both against and for power,Post-Marxism has combined discourse practice with radical plural democracy,which helps revive the European Leftists for realizing their revolutionary missions though at the price of uncertainty.

Key concepts: Civil discourse, Politics, Sociology, Social practice, Plural, Epistemology, Discourse analysis, Critical discourse analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discourse Practice and Radical Politics:From Foucault to Post-Marxism — Research Paper | ScholarLens