2012Xiandai faxueRequires access

Criminal Methodology and Judicial Logic

Zhou Guang-quan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

While it is necessary to tackle the problem of wrong sentence from the perspective of procedural law,evidence and judicial reform,substantive law is indeed of the same importance in prevention of wrong sentence.An adequate theoretic framework of criminal substantive law must compose of rationality of methodology and judicial regularity and logic,conduce to settling certain judicial conundrums,and ultimately reach the target of human rights protection.To prevent wrong sentence,we must hold a position of criminal objectivism with which criminal methodology and relevant judicial logic will be cultivated.An inherent consistency and uniformity exists in respect of the basic position of criminal law,criminal methodology and criminal justice logic.As such,the four-element-of-crime theory popular in China is required to be improved so as to establish the central and prior position of the objective elements in the structure of criminology and change the original decision based on subjectivism into decision on objectivism,which will inevitably exert positive impact upon the formation of rational judicial logic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

While it is necessary to tackle the problem of wrong sentence from the perspective of procedural law,evidence and judicial reform,substantive law is indeed of the same importance in prevention of wrong sentence.An adequate theoretic framework of criminal substantive law must compose of rationality of methodology and judicial regularity and logic,conduce to settling certain judicial conundrums,and ultimately reach the target of human rights protection.To prevent wrong sentence,we must hold a position of criminal objectivism with which criminal methodology and relevant judicial logic will be cultivated.An inherent consistency and uniformity exists in respect of the basic position of criminal law,criminal methodology and criminal justice logic.As such,the four-element-of-crime theory popular in China is required to be improved so as to establish the central and prior position of the objective elements in the structure of criminology and change the original decision based on subjectivism into decision on objectivism,which will inevitably exert positive impact upon the formation of rational judicial logic.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

While it is necessary to tackle the problem of wrong sentence from the perspective of procedural law,evidence and judicial reform,substantive law is indeed of the same importance in prevention of wrong sentence.An adequate theoretic framework of criminal substantive law must compose of rationality of methodology and judicial regularity and logic,conduce to settling certain judicial conundrums,and ultimately reach the target of human rights protection.To prevent wrong sentence,we must hold a position of criminal objectivism with which criminal methodology and relevant judicial logic will be cultivated.An inherent consistency and uniformity exists in respect of the basic position of criminal law,criminal methodology and criminal justice logic.As such,the four-element-of-crime theory popular in China is required to be improved so as to establish the central and prior position of the objective elements in the structure of criminology and change the original decision based on subjectivism into decision on objectivism,which will inevitably exert positive impact upon the formation of rational judicial logic.

Key concepts: Objectivism, Law, Criminal procedure, Subjectivism, Criminal law, Rationality, Sentence, Judicial opinion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Criminal Methodology and Judicial Logic — Research Paper | ScholarLens