2005Unpublished venueRequires access

The natural course of pre-clinical spondylotic cervical cordcompression and predictors of its clinical manifestation

Josef Bednařík, Zdeněk Kadaňka, O. Novotný, Igor Urbánek, Dagmar Šurelová, Ladislav Dušek

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In a previous study (Bednarik et al., 1998) we showed the value of somatosensory and motor evoked potential (MEP) parameters in assessment of the clinical relevance of cervical cord compression in clinically silent cases. We felt that a comparison of the predictive value of some other electrophysiological, clinical and radiological variables was indicated, in a larger group of patients over a longer follow-up period. A group of 66 patients (32 women, 34 men, median age 50 years) with magnetic resonance signs of spondylotic cervical cord compression and without clear-cut clinical signs of spondylotic cervical myelopathy (SCM) was prospectively followed for at least 2 years (range: 2-8 years, median follow-up period: 4 years). Primary endpoint was the development of clinical myelopathic signs. Clinical, radiological and electrophysiological parameters were assessed by three independent observers and then correlated with the clinical outcome. Clinical signs of myelopathy were detected in 13 patients (19.7%) during the follow-up period. The only variables significantly associated with the development of clinically symptomatic SCM were the presence of symptomatic cervical radiculopathy (92% of SCM cases), abnormal somatosensory (SEP) and/or motor evoked potentials (84.6%) and EMG signs of multisegmental anterior horn cell lesion (61.5%). In contrast, radiological parameters, such as Pavlovs ratio, spinal cord compression ratio, and spinal cord hyperintensity and area, showed no significant association with the development of symptomatic SCM. Thirty-four patients showed no signs of clinical radiculopathy and normal EP and EMG findings at the beginning: none of them developed clinical signs of clinically symptomatic SCM during the follow-up period. Conclusions. Evoked potentials and EMG signs of subclinical cervical cord lesion together with clinical signs of cervical radiculopathy may predict the development of clinically manifest SCM and could thus serve as valuable tools in its management.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In a previous study (Bednarik et al., 1998) we showed the value of somatosensory and motor evoked potential (MEP) parameters in assessment of the clinical relevance of cervical cord compression in clinically silent cases. We felt that a comparison of the predictive value of some other electrophysiological, clinical and radiological variables was indicated, in a larger group of patients over a longer follow-up period. A group of 66 patients (32 women, 34 men, median age 50 years) with magnetic resonance signs of spondylotic cervical cord compression and without clear-cut clinical signs of spondylotic cervical myelopathy (SCM) was prospectively followed for at least 2 years (range: 2-8 years, median follow-up period: 4 years). Primary endpoint was the development of clinical myelopathic signs. Clinical, radiological and electrophysiological parameters were assessed by three independent observers and then correlated with the clinical outcome. Clinical signs of myelopathy were detected in 13 patients (19.7%) during the follow-up period. The only variables significantly associated with the development of clinically symptomatic SCM were the presence of symptomatic cervical radiculopathy (92% of SCM cases), abnormal somatosensory (SEP) and/or motor evoked potentials (84.6%) and EMG signs of multisegmental anterior horn cell lesion (61.5%). In contrast, radiological parameters, such as Pavlovs ratio, spinal cord compression ratio, and spinal cord hyperintensity and area, showed no significant association with the development of symptomatic SCM. Thirty-four patients showed no signs of clinical radiculopathy and normal EP and EMG findings at the beginning: none of them developed clinical signs of clinically symptomatic SCM during the follow-up period. Conclusions. Evoked potentials and EMG signs of subclinical cervical cord lesion together with clinical signs of cervical radiculopathy may predict the development of clinically manifest SCM and could thus serve as valuable tools in its management.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In a previous study (Bednarik et al., 1998) we showed the value of somatosensory and motor evoked potential (MEP) parameters in assessment of the clinical relevance of cervical cord compression in clinically silent cases. We felt that a comparison of the predictive value of some other electrophysiological, clinical and radiological variables was indicated, in a larger group of patients over a longer follow-up period. A group of 66 patients (32 women, 34 men, median age 50 years) with magnetic resonance signs of spondylotic cervical cord compression and without clear-cut clinical signs of spondylotic cervical myelopathy (SCM) was prospectively followed for at least 2 years (range: 2-8 years, median follow-up period: 4 years). Primary endpoint was the development of clinical myelopathic signs. Clinical, radiological and electrophysiological parameters were assessed by three independent observers and then correlated with the clinical outcome. Clinical signs of myelopathy were detected in 13 patients (19.7%) during the follow-up period. The only variables significantly associated with the development of clinically symptomatic SCM were the presence of symptomatic cervical radiculopathy (92% of SCM cases), abnormal somatosensory (SEP) and/or motor evoked potentials (84.6%) and EMG signs of multisegmental anterior horn cell lesion (61.5%). In contrast, radiological parameters, such as Pavlovs ratio, spinal cord compression ratio, and spinal cord hyperintensity and area, showed no significant association with the development of symptomatic SCM. Thirty-four patients showed no signs of clinical radiculopathy and normal EP and EMG findings at the beginning: none of them developed clinical signs of clinically symptomatic SCM during the follow-up period. Conclusions. Evoked potentials and EMG signs of subclinical cervical cord lesion together with clinical signs of cervical radiculopathy may predict the development of clinically manifest SCM and could thus serve as valuable tools in its management.

Key concepts: Medicine, Somatosensory evoked potential, Spinal cord, Spinal cord compression, Magnetic resonance imaging, Cervical spondylosis, Myelopathy, Clinical significance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The natural course of pre-clinical spondylotic cervical cordcompression and predictors of its clinical manifestation — Research Paper | ScholarLens