2003The Journal of Cervicodynia and LumbodyniaRequires access

Comparing the therapeutic efficacy between conservative therapy and unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis

Jia Li

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy between conservative therapy and unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods 38 patients of lumbar spinal stenosis with mild or moderate leg pain were divided into two groups, one group treated with conservative therapy,and the other group treated with unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression.Results The decompression technique produced a 68% rate of improvment compared with a 33% rate for conservatively treated patients.There were significant difference between the two groups.Conclusion Unilateral laminectomy in lumbar spinal stenosis leads to better results than does conservative treatment of patients who have mild to moderate leg pain with an exclusively or primarily unilateral distribution.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy between conservative therapy and unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods 38 patients of lumbar spinal stenosis with mild or moderate leg pain were divided into two groups, one group treated with conservative therapy,and the other group treated with unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression.Results The decompression technique produced a 68% rate of improvment compared with a 33% rate for conservatively treated patients.There were significant difference between the two groups.Conclusion Unilateral laminectomy in lumbar spinal stenosis leads to better results than does conservative treatment of patients who have mild to moderate leg pain with an exclusively or primarily unilateral distribution.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the therapeutic efficacy between conservative therapy and unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods 38 patients of lumbar spinal stenosis with mild or moderate leg pain were divided into two groups, one group treated with conservative therapy,and the other group treated with unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression.Results The decompression technique produced a 68% rate of improvment compared with a 33% rate for conservatively treated patients.There were significant difference between the two groups.Conclusion Unilateral laminectomy in lumbar spinal stenosis leads to better results than does conservative treatment of patients who have mild to moderate leg pain with an exclusively or primarily unilateral distribution.

Key concepts: Medicine, Laminectomy, Lumbar spinal stenosis, Decompression, Surgery, Therapeutic effect, Lumbar, Conservative treatment

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparing the therapeutic efficacy between conservative therapy and unilateral laminectomy for bilateral decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis — Research Paper | ScholarLens