The Principled Too and the Debate on Knowing and Doing --The Development of Chinese Philosophy during the Period from the Pre-Qin to Song and Ming Dynasties
Yu Chen
Abstract
Yu Chen
Abstract
A basic difference in the view of knowing and doing between the pre-Qin philosophy and Song-Ming philosophy is that the former is based on doing and the latter on knowing. Such a difference reflects a kind of ontological difference. In Song-Ming philosophy the ultimate term of ontology is ' Li' (principle), while in pre-Qin philosophy it is ' Too ' (way). Therefore, the shift of the paradigm of Chinese philosophy during the period from pre-Qin to Song and Ming dynasties finds an expression in the shift from Too to Principle.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A basic difference in the view of knowing and doing between the pre-Qin philosophy and Song-Ming philosophy is that the former is based on doing and the latter on knowing. Such a difference reflects a kind of ontological difference. In Song-Ming philosophy the ultimate term of ontology is ' Li' (principle), while in pre-Qin philosophy it is ' Too ' (way). Therefore, the shift of the paradigm of Chinese philosophy during the period from pre-Qin to Song and Ming dynasties finds an expression in the shift from Too to Principle.
Key concepts: Period (music), Chinese philosophy, Philosophy, Ontology, Epistemology, Significant difference, Term (time), Western philosophy