2002•Huadong Shifan Daxue xuebao. Ziran kexue banRequires access

The Principled Too and the Debate on Knowing and Doing --The Development of Chinese Philosophy during the Period from the Pre-Qin to Song and Ming Dynasties

Yu Chen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

A basic difference in the view of knowing and doing between the pre-Qin philosophy and Song-Ming philosophy is that the former is based on doing and the latter on knowing. Such a difference reflects a kind of ontological difference. In Song-Ming philosophy the ultimate term of ontology is ' Li' (principle), while in pre-Qin philosophy it is ' Too ' (way). Therefore, the shift of the paradigm of Chinese philosophy during the period from pre-Qin to Song and Ming dynasties finds an expression in the shift from Too to Principle.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A basic difference in the view of knowing and doing between the pre-Qin philosophy and Song-Ming philosophy is that the former is based on doing and the latter on knowing. Such a difference reflects a kind of ontological difference. In Song-Ming philosophy the ultimate term of ontology is ' Li' (principle), while in pre-Qin philosophy it is ' Too ' (way). Therefore, the shift of the paradigm of Chinese philosophy during the period from pre-Qin to Song and Ming dynasties finds an expression in the shift from Too to Principle.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A basic difference in the view of knowing and doing between the pre-Qin philosophy and Song-Ming philosophy is that the former is based on doing and the latter on knowing. Such a difference reflects a kind of ontological difference. In Song-Ming philosophy the ultimate term of ontology is ' Li' (principle), while in pre-Qin philosophy it is ' Too ' (way). Therefore, the shift of the paradigm of Chinese philosophy during the period from pre-Qin to Song and Ming dynasties finds an expression in the shift from Too to Principle.

Key concepts: Period (music), Chinese philosophy, Philosophy, Ontology, Epistemology, Significant difference, Term (time), Western philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Principled Too and the Debate on Knowing and Doing --The Development of Chinese Philosophy during the Period from the Pre-Qin to Song and Ming Dynasties — Research Paper | ScholarLens