2015Shidai faxueRequires access

The Analysis on the Legality of U. S. Export Credit Guarantee Programs for Agricultural Products from the Perspective of WTO Law

Zou Guo-yon

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The export credit guarantee program for agricultural products is an important and effective means for the United States of America to encourage its agricultural exports and compete in overseas markets. Under the framework of WTO law,the determination of the legality of U. S. export credit guarantee program for agricultural products depends on whether it constitutes an evasion or evasion threats to export commitments under the Agreement on Agriculture,and whether it falls within the jurisdiction of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures( SCM Agreement) and constitutes prohibited subsidies under that Agreement. In the Brazil v. U. S. upland cotton subsidies case,it was questioned for the first time the legality of U. S. export credit guarantee programs for agricultural products and such programs were determined to constitute export subsidies and prohibited subsidies and violate the provisions of the Agreement on Agriculture and the SCM Agreement. In response to the infringement potentially brought by U. S. export credit programs for agricultural products against the agricultural interests of our country,we should urge the United States through bilateral negotiations to modify those programs,promote actively the multilateral trade negotiations under WTO in order to formulate relevant rules,make full use of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism,and,if necessary,start domestic countervailing proceedings.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The export credit guarantee program for agricultural products is an important and effective means for the United States of America to encourage its agricultural exports and compete in overseas markets. Under the framework of WTO law,the determination of the legality of U. S. export credit guarantee program for agricultural products depends on whether it constitutes an evasion or evasion threats to export commitments under the Agreement on Agriculture,and whether it falls within the jurisdiction of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures( SCM Agreement) and constitutes prohibited subsidies under that Agreement. In the Brazil v. U. S. upland cotton subsidies case,it was questioned for the first time the legality of U. S. export credit guarantee programs for agricultural products and such programs were determined to constitute export subsidies and prohibited subsidies and violate the provisions of the Agreement on Agriculture and the SCM Agreement. In response to the infringement potentially brought by U. S. export credit programs for agricultural products against the agricultural interests of our country,we should urge the United States through bilateral negotiations to modify those programs,promote actively the multilateral trade negotiations under WTO in order to formulate relevant rules,make full use of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism,and,if necessary,start domestic countervailing proceedings.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The export credit guarantee program for agricultural products is an important and effective means for the United States of America to encourage its agricultural exports and compete in overseas markets. Under the framework of WTO law,the determination of the legality of U. S. export credit guarantee program for agricultural products depends on whether it constitutes an evasion or evasion threats to export commitments under the Agreement on Agriculture,and whether it falls within the jurisdiction of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures( SCM Agreement) and constitutes prohibited subsidies under that Agreement. In the Brazil v. U. S. upland cotton subsidies case,it was questioned for the first time the legality of U. S. export credit guarantee programs for agricultural products and such programs were determined to constitute export subsidies and prohibited subsidies and violate the provisions of the Agreement on Agriculture and the SCM Agreement. In response to the infringement potentially brought by U. S. export credit programs for agricultural products against the agricultural interests of our country,we should urge the United States through bilateral negotiations to modify those programs,promote actively the multilateral trade negotiations under WTO in order to formulate relevant rules,make full use of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism,and,if necessary,start domestic countervailing proceedings.

Key concepts: Subsidy, Principle of legality, Agreement on Agriculture, International trade, Negotiation, Agriculture, Business, Letter of credit

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Analysis on the Legality of U. S. Export Credit Guarantee Programs for Agricultural Products from the Perspective of WTO Law — Research Paper | ScholarLens