2012•Shanghai Medical ImagingRequires access

Comparison of color Doppler flow imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for blood flow detection in renal lesions

Wen‐Ping Wang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the display rate of blood supply in renal lesions between color Doppler flow imaging(CDFI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(CEUS).Methods A total of 432 renal lesions were scanned by CDFI and CEUS during June 2004 to February 2010.All lesions were confirmed by surgical pathology,including 346 malignant tumors and 86 benign tumors.The size,inner echoes,boundary,blood signal of tumors and its location were observed by CDFI.The degree of tumor vascularity was subjectively graded from 0 to Ⅳ.The modality and phase of enhancement,including the arrival time,the peak time,the washout time and enhancement appearance of lesions were studied by CEUS.Results The display rates of blood signal and arterial blood signal in malignant group were higher than those in benign group by CDFI.The grade Ⅲ and grade Ⅳ were the common types in malignant group,as well as the grade 0 and grade Ⅲ being the common types in benign group.The difference in grade of tumor vascularity was significant between malignant and benign groups(P0.01).The total display rate of blood signal in renal lesions by CEUS was higher than CDFI,as well as display rate of blood signal in malignant or benign lesions(P0.05).Conclusion CEUS is better than CDFI in display of blood supply and detection of blood signal.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the display rate of blood supply in renal lesions between color Doppler flow imaging(CDFI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(CEUS).Methods A total of 432 renal lesions were scanned by CDFI and CEUS during June 2004 to February 2010.All lesions were confirmed by surgical pathology,including 346 malignant tumors and 86 benign tumors.The size,inner echoes,boundary,blood signal of tumors and its location were observed by CDFI.The degree of tumor vascularity was subjectively graded from 0 to Ⅳ.The modality and phase of enhancement,including the arrival time,the peak time,the washout time and enhancement appearance of lesions were studied by CEUS.Results The display rates of blood signal and arterial blood signal in malignant group were higher than those in benign group by CDFI.The grade Ⅲ and grade Ⅳ were the common types in malignant group,as well as the grade 0 and grade Ⅲ being the common types in benign group.The difference in grade of tumor vascularity was significant between malignant and benign groups(P0.01).The total display rate of blood signal in renal lesions by CEUS was higher than CDFI,as well as display rate of blood signal in malignant or benign lesions(P0.05).Conclusion CEUS is better than CDFI in display of blood supply and detection of blood signal.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the display rate of blood supply in renal lesions between color Doppler flow imaging(CDFI) and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography(CEUS).Methods A total of 432 renal lesions were scanned by CDFI and CEUS during June 2004 to February 2010.All lesions were confirmed by surgical pathology,including 346 malignant tumors and 86 benign tumors.The size,inner echoes,boundary,blood signal of tumors and its location were observed by CDFI.The degree of tumor vascularity was subjectively graded from 0 to Ⅳ.The modality and phase of enhancement,including the arrival time,the peak time,the washout time and enhancement appearance of lesions were studied by CEUS.Results The display rates of blood signal and arterial blood signal in malignant group were higher than those in benign group by CDFI.The grade Ⅲ and grade Ⅳ were the common types in malignant group,as well as the grade 0 and grade Ⅲ being the common types in benign group.The difference in grade of tumor vascularity was significant between malignant and benign groups(P0.01).The total display rate of blood signal in renal lesions by CEUS was higher than CDFI,as well as display rate of blood signal in malignant or benign lesions(P0.05).Conclusion CEUS is better than CDFI in display of blood supply and detection of blood signal.

Key concepts: Vascularity, Medicine, Blood flow, Color doppler, Radiology, Washout, Ultrasonography, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of color Doppler flow imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for blood flow detection in renal lesions — Research Paper | ScholarLens