2007•Journal of Wenzhou UniversityRequires access

How Can the Practice Ontological Aesthetics Be Possible

Lei Han

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

From the Soviet Union philosophy, Mr. Zhanghui held that Marx's theory of practice is only part of the category of practice and epistemology, and the theory of practice can’t be in tune with the existentialism, whereby he concludes that the practice ontological aesthetics is post-practice aesthetics. However, from the ontology in Marxist Philosophy, practice is in the area of ontology, and it is related to the existence of people, so the theory of practice is united with the existentialist. On Heidegger’s ontology, the existentialism is metaphysical so as to make it a utopia without foundation. It couldn’t be used as the foundation of the reconstruction of aesthetics. We must use the Marx's theory of practice to transform the existentialism towards the practice ontological aesthetics. The practice ontological aesthetics is developed from and beyond the traditional aesthetics, which is to transform the existentialism with the theory of practice but not the opposite, so it is not a post-practice aesthetics.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

From the Soviet Union philosophy, Mr. Zhanghui held that Marx's theory of practice is only part of the category of practice and epistemology, and the theory of practice can’t be in tune with the existentialism, whereby he concludes that the practice ontological aesthetics is post-practice aesthetics. However, from the ontology in Marxist Philosophy, practice is in the area of ontology, and it is related to the existence of people, so the theory of practice is united with the existentialist. On Heidegger’s ontology, the existentialism is metaphysical so as to make it a utopia without foundation. It couldn’t be used as the foundation of the reconstruction of aesthetics. We must use the Marx's theory of practice to transform the existentialism towards the practice ontological aesthetics. The practice ontological aesthetics is developed from and beyond the traditional aesthetics, which is to transform the existentialism with the theory of practice but not the opposite, so it is not a post-practice aesthetics.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

From the Soviet Union philosophy, Mr. Zhanghui held that Marx's theory of practice is only part of the category of practice and epistemology, and the theory of practice can’t be in tune with the existentialism, whereby he concludes that the practice ontological aesthetics is post-practice aesthetics. However, from the ontology in Marxist Philosophy, practice is in the area of ontology, and it is related to the existence of people, so the theory of practice is united with the existentialist. On Heidegger’s ontology, the existentialism is metaphysical so as to make it a utopia without foundation. It couldn’t be used as the foundation of the reconstruction of aesthetics. We must use the Marx's theory of practice to transform the existentialism towards the practice ontological aesthetics. The practice ontological aesthetics is developed from and beyond the traditional aesthetics, which is to transform the existentialism with the theory of practice but not the opposite, so it is not a post-practice aesthetics.

Key concepts: Existentialism, Metaphysics, Ontology, Marxist philosophy, Epistemology, Aesthetics, Fundamental ontology, Foundation (evidence)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
How Can the Practice Ontological Aesthetics Be Possible — Research Paper | ScholarLens