Health risk assessment of heavy metals in drinking water in Jiangsu Province
Xiaohong Chen
Abstract
Xiaohong Chen
Abstract
Objective To assess health risk of heavy metals in drinking water in Jiangsu Province.Methods Six heavy metals concentration were detected by ICP-MS analysis method.Health risk associated 6 heavy metals in drinking water were assessed using USEPA health risk assessment model.Results The median concentration of six metals was:2 μg/L for Cr6+,0.5 μg/L for As,0.03 μg/L for Cd,0.36 μg/L for Pb,0.35 μg/L for Hg,5 μg/L for Zn.The carcinogenic risk level is:Cr6+ for 4.23×10-5/a,As for 5.66×10-6/a,Cd for 37.65×10-8/a.The non carcinogenic risk level is:Pb for 34.59×10-11/a,Hg for 16.35×10-10/a,Zn for 62.73×10-7/a.The rank of health risk is Cr6+ZnCdHgPb.The total health risk level is 5.47×10-5/a.Conclusion The total health risk level was higher than ICRP recommended level(5×10-5),while lower than US EPA recommended level(1×10-4).
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To assess health risk of heavy metals in drinking water in Jiangsu Province.Methods Six heavy metals concentration were detected by ICP-MS analysis method.Health risk associated 6 heavy metals in drinking water were assessed using USEPA health risk assessment model.Results The median concentration of six metals was:2 μg/L for Cr6+,0.5 μg/L for As,0.03 μg/L for Cd,0.36 μg/L for Pb,0.35 μg/L for Hg,5 μg/L for Zn.The carcinogenic risk level is:Cr6+ for 4.23×10-5/a,As for 5.66×10-6/a,Cd for 37.65×10-8/a.The non carcinogenic risk level is:Pb for 34.59×10-11/a,Hg for 16.35×10-10/a,Zn for 62.73×10-7/a.The rank of health risk is Cr6+ZnCdHgPb.The total health risk level is 5.47×10-5/a.Conclusion The total health risk level was higher than ICRP recommended level(5×10-5),while lower than US EPA recommended level(1×10-4).
Key concepts: Health risk assessment, Heavy metals, Health risk, Risk assessment, Environmental health, Environmental chemistry, Toxicology, Chemistry