2008Radiologic PracticeRequires access

Clinical Value of Axial Loading of the Lumbar Spine During Computed Tomography

Dang Yu-qing

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To estimate the clinical value of axial loading of the lumbar spine during computed tomography (CT) in patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.Methods:Patients with degenerative disorders were exa-mined by CT in psoas-relaxed position (PRP) and axial compression in slight extension (ACE) position and reconstruction with maximum intensity projection (MIP) was performed.The maximum transverse diameter,sagittal diameter of vertebral canal and dural sac cross-sectional area of central layer of L2~S1 intervertebral disc were compared and statistically analyzed before and after loading.Results:CT examinations revealed the transverse diameter sagittal diameter of vertebral canal and dural sac cross-sectional areas of central layer were significantly decreased in ACE position as compared with PRP.Conclusions:As compared to PRP CT,CT on the ACE position could obtain more radiological diagnosis information which is regarded as important evidence for clinical diagnosis of spinal stenosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To estimate the clinical value of axial loading of the lumbar spine during computed tomography (CT) in patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.Methods:Patients with degenerative disorders were exa-mined by CT in psoas-relaxed position (PRP) and axial compression in slight extension (ACE) position and reconstruction with maximum intensity projection (MIP) was performed.The maximum transverse diameter,sagittal diameter of vertebral canal and dural sac cross-sectional area of central layer of L2~S1 intervertebral disc were compared and statistically analyzed before and after loading.Results:CT examinations revealed the transverse diameter sagittal diameter of vertebral canal and dural sac cross-sectional areas of central layer were significantly decreased in ACE position as compared with PRP.Conclusions:As compared to PRP CT,CT on the ACE position could obtain more radiological diagnosis information which is regarded as important evidence for clinical diagnosis of spinal stenosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To estimate the clinical value of axial loading of the lumbar spine during computed tomography (CT) in patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.Methods:Patients with degenerative disorders were exa-mined by CT in psoas-relaxed position (PRP) and axial compression in slight extension (ACE) position and reconstruction with maximum intensity projection (MIP) was performed.The maximum transverse diameter,sagittal diameter of vertebral canal and dural sac cross-sectional area of central layer of L2~S1 intervertebral disc were compared and statistically analyzed before and after loading.Results:CT examinations revealed the transverse diameter sagittal diameter of vertebral canal and dural sac cross-sectional areas of central layer were significantly decreased in ACE position as compared with PRP.Conclusions:As compared to PRP CT,CT on the ACE position could obtain more radiological diagnosis information which is regarded as important evidence for clinical diagnosis of spinal stenosis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Sagittal plane, Lateral recess, Tomography, Spinal stenosis, Stenosis, Maximum intensity projection, Radiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical Value of Axial Loading of the Lumbar Spine During Computed Tomography — Research Paper | ScholarLens