Influences of different palatoplasties on palatal growth and speech development: comparison between Osada's two-stage palatoplasty and one-stage mucosal flap procedure.
Tadashi Akamatsu, Ryuzaburo Tanino, Mitsuhiro Osada, Yuko Sakuma
Abstract
Tadashi Akamatsu, Ryuzaburo Tanino, Mitsuhiro Osada, Yuko Sakuma
Abstract
Palatal growth and articulation in two different palatal closure techniques, Osada's two-stage procedure and the conventional one-stage procedure, were evaluated in 12 patients. Osada's procedure (hard palate closure using a vomer flap with complete closure of the raw surface by a full thickness skin graft) is a two-stage operation that consists of early soft palate closure at the time of lip closure (3 to 6 months of age). The palatal sizes and the depth of the palatal arch were significantly greater in the two-stage group than in the one-stage group at 1 year of age and, 3 to 5 years of age. There were no differences between the two groups at the velopharyngeal closure evaluation after hard palate closure and at final speech evaluation. Osada's two-stage palatoplasty has many advantages and we believe that this is one of the most recommendable procedures at present.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Palatal growth and articulation in two different palatal closure techniques, Osada's two-stage procedure and the conventional one-stage procedure, were evaluated in 12 patients. Osada's procedure (hard palate closure using a vomer flap with complete closure of the raw surface by a full thickness skin graft) is a two-stage operation that consists of early soft palate closure at the time of lip closure (3 to 6 months of age). The palatal sizes and the depth of the palatal arch were significantly greater in the two-stage group than in the one-stage group at 1 year of age and, 3 to 5 years of age. There were no differences between the two groups at the velopharyngeal closure evaluation after hard palate closure and at final speech evaluation. Osada's two-stage palatoplasty has many advantages and we believe that this is one of the most recommendable procedures at present.
Key concepts: Palatoplasty, Vomer, Medicine, Stage (stratigraphy), Hard palate, Closure (psychology), Soft palate, Articulation (sociology)