2007•Zhongguo yixue wulixue zazhiRequires access

Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in the Treatment of Inoperable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Ming Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) used to treat non-small cell lung cancer, investigate the conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), the dose to organs at risk(OARs), and evaluate the difference in the IMRT plans using five, seven, and nine beams. Methods: A retrospective treatment planning study was performed to compare IMRT plans for 22 patients with StageⅠto Ⅲ inoperable NSCLC. One target volume was predefined: PTV, which was given 66 Gy. Three plans were designed for each patient: 5, 7 and 9 beams IMRT plans. The dosimetric distribution, normal tissue complication probability(NTCP), the dose of organs at risk were calculated. Results: Under the same prescription dose, CI of 5, 7 and 9 beams IMRT plan were 0.68, 0.70, 0.70, HI of 5, 7 and 9 beams IMRT plans were 1.18, 1.18, 1.19. The total lung volume receiving radiation 20 Gy (V20) were 16.95%, 16.82%, 16.73%, NTCP were 2.26%, 2.43%, 2.42%. The total esophageal volume receiving radiation 50 Gy (V50) were 6.68%, 6.82%, 6.59%, NTCP were 5.07%, 4.74%, 4.6%. The dose of 1% spinal cord volume were 3424 cGy, 3726 cGy, 3675 cGy, NTCP were 0.2%, 0.25%, 0.18%. Conclusions: For treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer, IMRT plans may result in a desirable dose distribution. Five beams IMRT plan can be accepted by clinical.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To systematically evaluate intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) used to treat non-small cell lung cancer, investigate the conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), the dose to organs at risk(OARs), and evaluate the difference in the IMRT plans using five, seven, and nine beams. Methods: A retrospective treatment planning study was performed to compare IMRT plans for 22 patients with StageⅠto Ⅲ inoperable NSCLC. One target volume was predefined: PTV, which was given 66 Gy. Three plans were designed for each patient: 5, 7 and 9 beams IMRT plans. The dosimetric distribution, normal tissue complication probability(NTCP), the dose of organs at risk were calculated. Results: Under the same prescription dose, CI of 5, 7 and 9 beams IMRT plan were 0.68, 0.70, 0.70, HI of 5, 7 and 9 beams IMRT plans were 1.18, 1.18, 1.19. The total lung volume receiving radiation 20 Gy (V20) were 16.95%, 16.82%, 16.73%, NTCP were 2.26%, 2.43%, 2.42%. The total esophageal volume receiving radiation 50 Gy (V50) were 6.68%, 6.82%, 6.59%, NTCP were 5.07%, 4.74%, 4.6%. The dose of 1% spinal cord volume were 3424 cGy, 3726 cGy, 3675 cGy, NTCP were 0.2%, 0.25%, 0.18%. Conclusions: For treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer, IMRT plans may result in a desirable dose distribution. Five beams IMRT plan can be accepted by clinical.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To systematically evaluate intensity-modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) used to treat non-small cell lung cancer, investigate the conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), the dose to organs at risk(OARs), and evaluate the difference in the IMRT plans using five, seven, and nine beams. Methods: A retrospective treatment planning study was performed to compare IMRT plans for 22 patients with StageⅠto Ⅲ inoperable NSCLC. One target volume was predefined: PTV, which was given 66 Gy. Three plans were designed for each patient: 5, 7 and 9 beams IMRT plans. The dosimetric distribution, normal tissue complication probability(NTCP), the dose of organs at risk were calculated. Results: Under the same prescription dose, CI of 5, 7 and 9 beams IMRT plan were 0.68, 0.70, 0.70, HI of 5, 7 and 9 beams IMRT plans were 1.18, 1.18, 1.19. The total lung volume receiving radiation 20 Gy (V20) were 16.95%, 16.82%, 16.73%, NTCP were 2.26%, 2.43%, 2.42%. The total esophageal volume receiving radiation 50 Gy (V50) were 6.68%, 6.82%, 6.59%, NTCP were 5.07%, 4.74%, 4.6%. The dose of 1% spinal cord volume were 3424 cGy, 3726 cGy, 3675 cGy, NTCP were 0.2%, 0.25%, 0.18%. Conclusions: For treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer, IMRT plans may result in a desirable dose distribution. Five beams IMRT plan can be accepted by clinical.

Key concepts: Medicine, Radiation therapy, Nuclear medicine, Radiation treatment planning, Lung cancer, Dosimetry, Radiology, Oncology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) in the Treatment of Inoperable Non-small Cell Lung Cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens