2006•Shiyong yixue zazhiRequires access

A comparative study of cefepime/amikacin versus ceftazidime/amikacin as empirical therapy for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in leukemia patients due to chemotherapy

Rui Gao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of cefepime or ceftazidime in combination with amikacin in the treatment of febrile neutropenia in leukemia patients induced by chemotherapy. Method The data of 117 adult leukemia patients with febrile neutropenia treated with cefepime/amikacin or ceftazidime/amikacin in our hospital in recent years were retrospectively analyzed. Results The overall response rates to the two empirical regimens were 64.52% for the cefepime/amikacin and 62.75% for ceftazidime/amikacin groups, respectively (P 0.05). Drug- related side- effects were mild and reversible. Conclusion Cefepime in combination with amikacin can be as effective, safe and tolerable as ceftazidime plus amikacin in leukemia patients with febrile neutropenia and severe infection due to chemotherapy.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the efficacy of cefepime or ceftazidime in combination with amikacin in the treatment of febrile neutropenia in leukemia patients induced by chemotherapy. Method The data of 117 adult leukemia patients with febrile neutropenia treated with cefepime/amikacin or ceftazidime/amikacin in our hospital in recent years were retrospectively analyzed. Results The overall response rates to the two empirical regimens were 64.52% for the cefepime/amikacin and 62.75% for ceftazidime/amikacin groups, respectively (P 0.05). Drug- related side- effects were mild and reversible. Conclusion Cefepime in combination with amikacin can be as effective, safe and tolerable as ceftazidime plus amikacin in leukemia patients with febrile neutropenia and severe infection due to chemotherapy.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the efficacy of cefepime or ceftazidime in combination with amikacin in the treatment of febrile neutropenia in leukemia patients induced by chemotherapy. Method The data of 117 adult leukemia patients with febrile neutropenia treated with cefepime/amikacin or ceftazidime/amikacin in our hospital in recent years were retrospectively analyzed. Results The overall response rates to the two empirical regimens were 64.52% for the cefepime/amikacin and 62.75% for ceftazidime/amikacin groups, respectively (P 0.05). Drug- related side- effects were mild and reversible. Conclusion Cefepime in combination with amikacin can be as effective, safe and tolerable as ceftazidime plus amikacin in leukemia patients with febrile neutropenia and severe infection due to chemotherapy.

Key concepts: Cefepime, Amikacin, Ceftazidime, Medicine, Febrile neutropenia, Neutropenia, Chemotherapy, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A comparative study of cefepime/amikacin versus ceftazidime/amikacin as empirical therapy for the treatment of febrile neutropenia in leukemia patients due to chemotherapy — Research Paper | ScholarLens