Evaluation of Liver Perfusion in Cirrhosis Patients with Projects of Maximum Slope Method on Computed Tomography
Xie Hongbo
Abstract
Xie Hongbo
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of measuring hepatic perfusion parameters in patients with liver cirrhosis associated with splenomegaly with different maximum slope methods on computed tomography. Materials and Methods CT perfusion was performed in 17 patients with liver cirrhosis associated with splenomegaly and 14 volunteers. Hepatic perfusion parameters were measured with classic maximum slope method, improved project and deconvolution technique respectively. Results In the control group, there was no significant difference in hepatic perfusion between three methods (P0.05). In the liver cirrhosis group, the parameters of portal vein perfusion and total hepatic perfusion calculated by the classic method were significantly lower than other two methods (P0.05). ConclusionIn patients with liver cirrhosis associated with splenomegaly, the improved project was more accurate than the classic method in the evaluation of hepatic perfusion.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of measuring hepatic perfusion parameters in patients with liver cirrhosis associated with splenomegaly with different maximum slope methods on computed tomography. Materials and Methods CT perfusion was performed in 17 patients with liver cirrhosis associated with splenomegaly and 14 volunteers. Hepatic perfusion parameters were measured with classic maximum slope method, improved project and deconvolution technique respectively. Results In the control group, there was no significant difference in hepatic perfusion between three methods (P0.05). In the liver cirrhosis group, the parameters of portal vein perfusion and total hepatic perfusion calculated by the classic method were significantly lower than other two methods (P0.05). ConclusionIn patients with liver cirrhosis associated with splenomegaly, the improved project was more accurate than the classic method in the evaluation of hepatic perfusion.
Key concepts: Medicine, Cirrhosis, Perfusion, Perfusion scanning, Liver perfusion, Radiology, Computed tomography, Nuclear medicine