The comparison between two HPLC for serum phenylalanine
Xi-ming Mo
Abstract
Xi-ming Mo
Abstract
ObjectiveComparison the two high performance liquid chromatography(HPLC) for serum phenylalanine(phe). MethodsHPLC-ultraviolet absorbing detection(HPLC-UV) and HPLC-fluorescence detection(HPLC-FLD) were compared in linear range, recovery rate detection limit and precision. Identical samples were detected with two HPLC methods, The results were analyzed. ResultsThe linear range, mean recovery rate, in-run CV and between-run CV were 61512 μmol/L, 0.75 μmol/L, 3.68% and 4.01% for HPLC-UV, respectively, and 121220 μmol/L, 3 μmol/L, 102.5%, 4.07% and 7.17% for HPLC-FLD, respectively. ConclusionBoth HPLC are sensitive, accurate, simple, rapid and adapted for clinical use. The HPLC-UV is more presision and rapid than the HPLC-FLD.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
ObjectiveComparison the two high performance liquid chromatography(HPLC) for serum phenylalanine(phe). MethodsHPLC-ultraviolet absorbing detection(HPLC-UV) and HPLC-fluorescence detection(HPLC-FLD) were compared in linear range, recovery rate detection limit and precision. Identical samples were detected with two HPLC methods, The results were analyzed. ResultsThe linear range, mean recovery rate, in-run CV and between-run CV were 61512 μmol/L, 0.75 μmol/L, 3.68% and 4.01% for HPLC-UV, respectively, and 121220 μmol/L, 3 μmol/L, 102.5%, 4.07% and 7.17% for HPLC-FLD, respectively. ConclusionBoth HPLC are sensitive, accurate, simple, rapid and adapted for clinical use. The HPLC-UV is more presision and rapid than the HPLC-FLD.
Key concepts: High-performance liquid chromatography, Chromatography, Detection limit, Chemistry, Linear range, Recovery rate