2003Zhongguo kangganran hualiao zazhiRequires access

The susceptibility analysis of ureaplasma urealyticum to macrolides agents

Yimou Wu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To determine the susceptibility of ureaplasma urealyticum (Uu) to 14-membered(erythromycin and rox-ithromycin) ,15-membered(azithromycin) and 16-membered(josamycin and kitsamycin) macrolides for the rational use of antibiotics. Methods: The MIC of five macrolides against 203 strains of Uu were determined using broth microdilution method. Results: The resistant rates of 203 Uu strains were as follows: erythromycin 11.8%, roxithromycin 7.4%, azithromycin 6.9%, josamycin 3.9%, kitasamycin 3.5%. Among the five macrolides, josamycin and kitasamycin were the most active agents against Uu.the MIC50 being 0.125 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L,respectively;MIC90 being 0.5 mg/L and 1 mg/L, respectively;erythromycin and roxithromycin were less active against Uu, the MIC50 being 4 mg/L and 4 mg/L, and MIC90 being 8 mg/L and 8 mg/L. Conclusions: The degree of resistance of Uu to different macrolides varied 16-membered macrolides such as josamycin and kitasamycin are more active against Uu than 14-membered and 15-membered macrolides.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To determine the susceptibility of ureaplasma urealyticum (Uu) to 14-membered(erythromycin and rox-ithromycin) ,15-membered(azithromycin) and 16-membered(josamycin and kitsamycin) macrolides for the rational use of antibiotics. Methods: The MIC of five macrolides against 203 strains of Uu were determined using broth microdilution method. Results: The resistant rates of 203 Uu strains were as follows: erythromycin 11.8%, roxithromycin 7.4%, azithromycin 6.9%, josamycin 3.9%, kitasamycin 3.5%. Among the five macrolides, josamycin and kitasamycin were the most active agents against Uu.the MIC50 being 0.125 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L,respectively;MIC90 being 0.5 mg/L and 1 mg/L, respectively;erythromycin and roxithromycin were less active against Uu, the MIC50 being 4 mg/L and 4 mg/L, and MIC90 being 8 mg/L and 8 mg/L. Conclusions: The degree of resistance of Uu to different macrolides varied 16-membered macrolides such as josamycin and kitasamycin are more active against Uu than 14-membered and 15-membered macrolides.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To determine the susceptibility of ureaplasma urealyticum (Uu) to 14-membered(erythromycin and rox-ithromycin) ,15-membered(azithromycin) and 16-membered(josamycin and kitsamycin) macrolides for the rational use of antibiotics. Methods: The MIC of five macrolides against 203 strains of Uu were determined using broth microdilution method. Results: The resistant rates of 203 Uu strains were as follows: erythromycin 11.8%, roxithromycin 7.4%, azithromycin 6.9%, josamycin 3.9%, kitasamycin 3.5%. Among the five macrolides, josamycin and kitasamycin were the most active agents against Uu.the MIC50 being 0.125 mg/L and 0.5 mg/L,respectively;MIC90 being 0.5 mg/L and 1 mg/L, respectively;erythromycin and roxithromycin were less active against Uu, the MIC50 being 4 mg/L and 4 mg/L, and MIC90 being 8 mg/L and 8 mg/L. Conclusions: The degree of resistance of Uu to different macrolides varied 16-membered macrolides such as josamycin and kitasamycin are more active against Uu than 14-membered and 15-membered macrolides.

Key concepts: Josamycin, Roxithromycin, Ureaplasma urealyticum, Erythromycin, Azithromycin, Broth microdilution, Microbiology, Ureaplasma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The susceptibility analysis of ureaplasma urealyticum to macrolides agents — Research Paper | ScholarLens