2012Jinrong pinglunRequires access

Structural Differences of Life Insurance Demand:Protection and Investment

Xu Shu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This study compares and tests the determinants of the demand for two types life insurance:traditional life insurance and investment-oriented life insurance.Using cross-section data of 284 cities in 2008,the authors use seemingly unrelated regression and 3-stage least squares regress to estimate the demand equations of the two types life insurance.The result shows that:social security has a significant substitution effect on traditional life insurance and significantly promotes investment-oriented life insurance demand;the capacity of investment-oriented life insurance is greater than traditional life insurance in transforming the household savings;inflation expectation reduces traditional life insurance demand but increases investment-oriented life insurance demand;finance development benefits investment-oriented life insurance more than traditional life insurance.These conclusions are still robust when considering the influence and the endogeneity of supply-side factors.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study compares and tests the determinants of the demand for two types life insurance:traditional life insurance and investment-oriented life insurance.Using cross-section data of 284 cities in 2008,the authors use seemingly unrelated regression and 3-stage least squares regress to estimate the demand equations of the two types life insurance.The result shows that:social security has a significant substitution effect on traditional life insurance and significantly promotes investment-oriented life insurance demand;the capacity of investment-oriented life insurance is greater than traditional life insurance in transforming the household savings;inflation expectation reduces traditional life insurance demand but increases investment-oriented life insurance demand;finance development benefits investment-oriented life insurance more than traditional life insurance.These conclusions are still robust when considering the influence and the endogeneity of supply-side factors.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study compares and tests the determinants of the demand for two types life insurance:traditional life insurance and investment-oriented life insurance.Using cross-section data of 284 cities in 2008,the authors use seemingly unrelated regression and 3-stage least squares regress to estimate the demand equations of the two types life insurance.The result shows that:social security has a significant substitution effect on traditional life insurance and significantly promotes investment-oriented life insurance demand;the capacity of investment-oriented life insurance is greater than traditional life insurance in transforming the household savings;inflation expectation reduces traditional life insurance demand but increases investment-oriented life insurance demand;finance development benefits investment-oriented life insurance more than traditional life insurance.These conclusions are still robust when considering the influence and the endogeneity of supply-side factors.

Key concepts: Life insurance, Investment (military), Group insurance, Actuarial science, General insurance, Key person insurance, Endogeneity, Casualty insurance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Structural Differences of Life Insurance Demand:Protection and Investment — Research Paper | ScholarLens