2000Xi'nan nongye xuebaoRequires access

Analysis on the technological and economic effcets for different crossbreeding combinations in pig

Fu Mao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

On the base of reproductive performance,fattening performance,feed wastage of breeding swine and market price,technological and economical effects were evaluated for 6 different crossbreeding combinations including Duroc×Sichuan White Dam I(D×I),Duroc×Yorkshire(D×Y),Duroc×Landrace×Yorkshire(D×LY),Duroc×Yorkshire×Landrace(D×YL),Duroc×Yorkshire×Sichuan White Dam I(D×YI) and Duroc×Yorkshire×Local Swine(D×YB).The economical effects of D×Y,D×YI,D×YI,D×YL and D×I are higher than that of others.The gross benefit per sow are $61 52,58 83,57 75,32 74,respectively.Sichuan White Dam I ranks the first in the reproductive performances among 6 combinations,of which the number of born,the number of alive per litter and the number of weaner at 70 age per year are 12 57,11 71 and 22 47 heads,respectively,and Y×I for the corresponding performances ranks the second,those of which are 11 91,11 15 and 21 35 heads,respectively.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

On the base of reproductive performance,fattening performance,feed wastage of breeding swine and market price,technological and economical effects were evaluated for 6 different crossbreeding combinations including Duroc×Sichuan White Dam I(D×I),Duroc×Yorkshire(D×Y),Duroc×Landrace×Yorkshire(D×LY),Duroc×Yorkshire×Landrace(D×YL),Duroc×Yorkshire×Sichuan White Dam I(D×YI) and Duroc×Yorkshire×Local Swine(D×YB).The economical effects of D×Y,D×YI,D×YI,D×YL and D×I are higher than that of others.The gross benefit per sow are $61 52,58 83,57 75,32 74,respectively.Sichuan White Dam I ranks the first in the reproductive performances among 6 combinations,of which the number of born,the number of alive per litter and the number of weaner at 70 age per year are 12 57,11 71 and 22 47 heads,respectively,and Y×I for the corresponding performances ranks the second,those of which are 11 91,11 15 and 21 35 heads,respectively.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

On the base of reproductive performance,fattening performance,feed wastage of breeding swine and market price,technological and economical effects were evaluated for 6 different crossbreeding combinations including Duroc×Sichuan White Dam I(D×I),Duroc×Yorkshire(D×Y),Duroc×Landrace×Yorkshire(D×LY),Duroc×Yorkshire×Landrace(D×YL),Duroc×Yorkshire×Sichuan White Dam I(D×YI) and Duroc×Yorkshire×Local Swine(D×YB).The economical effects of D×Y,D×YI,D×YI,D×YL and D×I are higher than that of others.The gross benefit per sow are $61 52,58 83,57 75,32 74,respectively.Sichuan White Dam I ranks the first in the reproductive performances among 6 combinations,of which the number of born,the number of alive per litter and the number of weaner at 70 age per year are 12 57,11 71 and 22 47 heads,respectively,and Y×I for the corresponding performances ranks the second,those of which are 11 91,11 15 and 21 35 heads,respectively.

Key concepts: Crossbreed, Large white, Litter, Animal science, Pig breeding, Biology, White (mutation), Veterinary medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Analysis on the technological and economic effcets for different crossbreeding combinations in pig — Research Paper | ScholarLens