Clinical Effects of Two-Stage Revision Surgery in Treating Elderly Postoperative Infection after Total Hip Arthroplasty
Xiaohui Li
Abstract
Xiaohui Li
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the curative effect of two-stage revision of the hip joint for the treatment of elderly postoperative infection after hip arthroplasty. Methods A group of 11 patients(11 hips)above 75 years old with infections after hip arthroplasty admitted in our hospital between January 2001 and June 2008 were studied retrospectively about the clinical manifestation,treatment methods(removal of prosthesis spacer implanted during debridement in the first stage and revision of hip joint in the second stage),postoperative treatment and clinical effects. Results In the 9~42 months(average 18.5 months)′ postoperative follow-up,the mean Harris score increased significantly by 37.0,which was significantly different from preoperative score(P0.05).Infection occurred again in 1 case at the 9th month postoperatively,who was treated with Girdlestone arthrodesis at last. Conclusion Two-stage revision of the hip joint for the treatment of elderly postoperative infection after hip arthroplasty can achieve good results.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To evaluate the curative effect of two-stage revision of the hip joint for the treatment of elderly postoperative infection after hip arthroplasty. Methods A group of 11 patients(11 hips)above 75 years old with infections after hip arthroplasty admitted in our hospital between January 2001 and June 2008 were studied retrospectively about the clinical manifestation,treatment methods(removal of prosthesis spacer implanted during debridement in the first stage and revision of hip joint in the second stage),postoperative treatment and clinical effects. Results In the 9~42 months(average 18.5 months)′ postoperative follow-up,the mean Harris score increased significantly by 37.0,which was significantly different from preoperative score(P0.05).Infection occurred again in 1 case at the 9th month postoperatively,who was treated with Girdlestone arthrodesis at last. Conclusion Two-stage revision of the hip joint for the treatment of elderly postoperative infection after hip arthroplasty can achieve good results.
Key concepts: Medicine, Surgery, Stage (stratigraphy), Arthrodesis, Prosthesis, Arthroplasty, Hip arthroplasty, Harris Hip Score