2009Journal of Jiangsu Polytechnic UniversityRequires access

On the Absence of Effect Form in Insurance Contract in China

Peipei Liu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The insurance contract,a type of debt-credit contract,is regulated by Chinese Contract Law,but it,in many countries,is seperated for ruling from the scope of contract law owing to its special characteristics.In contrast with Chinese Contract Law,there only exist two kinds of effect form,that is effective contract and voidance contract in insurance contract according to the rules of Chinese Insurance Law.Take Article 56 as an example,many voidable contracts can be effective if both parties agree are pushed to the scope of voidance contract,which obeies the rule of autonomy of the will and has some harmful effect on the efficiency of striking agreements.Based on above analysis,it is necessary to consummate the rules about the effect form of insurance contract and give different treatment to the voidance insurace contract to return the voidable contracts that can be effective if both parties agree to the frame of Chinese Contract Law.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The insurance contract,a type of debt-credit contract,is regulated by Chinese Contract Law,but it,in many countries,is seperated for ruling from the scope of contract law owing to its special characteristics.In contrast with Chinese Contract Law,there only exist two kinds of effect form,that is effective contract and voidance contract in insurance contract according to the rules of Chinese Insurance Law.Take Article 56 as an example,many voidable contracts can be effective if both parties agree are pushed to the scope of voidance contract,which obeies the rule of autonomy of the will and has some harmful effect on the efficiency of striking agreements.Based on above analysis,it is necessary to consummate the rules about the effect form of insurance contract and give different treatment to the voidance insurace contract to return the voidable contracts that can be effective if both parties agree to the frame of Chinese Contract Law.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The insurance contract,a type of debt-credit contract,is regulated by Chinese Contract Law,but it,in many countries,is seperated for ruling from the scope of contract law owing to its special characteristics.In contrast with Chinese Contract Law,there only exist two kinds of effect form,that is effective contract and voidance contract in insurance contract according to the rules of Chinese Insurance Law.Take Article 56 as an example,many voidable contracts can be effective if both parties agree are pushed to the scope of voidance contract,which obeies the rule of autonomy of the will and has some harmful effect on the efficiency of striking agreements.Based on above analysis,it is necessary to consummate the rules about the effect form of insurance contract and give different treatment to the voidance insurace contract to return the voidable contracts that can be effective if both parties agree to the frame of Chinese Contract Law.

Key concepts: Exclusion clause, Scope (computer science), Business, Contract management, Insurance policy, Severability, Privity of contract, China

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On the Absence of Effect Form in Insurance Contract in China — Research Paper | ScholarLens