2005Journal of Clinical CardiologyRequires access

Comparison of effects of propofol pretreatment and ischemic preconditioning on ischemia-reperfusion injury in the isolated rat heart

Jing Wu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective:To compare the effects of propofol pretreatment and ischemic preconditioning on ischemia-reperfusion injury in the isolated rat heart and to determine whether propofol shared the same mechanism of IPC, which is related to mitochondrial K ATP channels. Method: Male rat hearts were isolated and perfused with oxygenated Krebs-Hensleit (K-H) in a Langendorff apparatus, then randomly divided into 6 groups. All isolated hearts were subjected to 30 min of no-flow global ischemia followed by 120 min reperfusion, after a treatment period consisting of no intervention after the pretreatment without (group A, n=8) or with 5-HD(100 μmol/L, group D, n=8), 10 min propofol (50 μmol/L) followed by a 10-min washout period without (group B, n=6) or with 5-HD (100 μmol/L, group E, n=6), or two times of 5 min of ischemia followed by 5 min reperfusion after the pretreatment without (group C, n=6) or with 5-HD(100 μmol/L, group F, n=7).The hemodynamic index and coronary flow were monitored continuously, an arrhythmia score was used to quantify the arrhythmias during reperfusion and TTC staining was used to determine infarct size.Result:During reperfusion, compared with group A, hemodynamic values, coronary flow, arrhythmia score and infarct size were significantly improved in group B、C、E, especially in group C (P0.01 or 0.05). Conclusion:Both propofol pretreatment and ischemic preconditioning improve function of the isolated rat heart after ischemia-reperfusion injury, attenuate the reperfusion arrhythmias and reduce infarct size. Propofol pretreatment shows less protection than ischemic preconditioning and is independent of mitochondrial K ATP channels.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective:To compare the effects of propofol pretreatment and ischemic preconditioning on ischemia-reperfusion injury in the isolated rat heart and to determine whether propofol shared the same mechanism of IPC, which is related to mitochondrial K ATP channels. Method: Male rat hearts were isolated and perfused with oxygenated Krebs-Hensleit (K-H) in a Langendorff apparatus, then randomly divided into 6 groups. All isolated hearts were subjected to 30 min of no-flow global ischemia followed by 120 min reperfusion, after a treatment period consisting of no intervention after the pretreatment without (group A, n=8) or with 5-HD(100 μmol/L, group D, n=8), 10 min propofol (50 μmol/L) followed by a 10-min washout period without (group B, n=6) or with 5-HD (100 μmol/L, group E, n=6), or two times of 5 min of ischemia followed by 5 min reperfusion after the pretreatment without (group C, n=6) or with 5-HD(100 μmol/L, group F, n=7).The hemodynamic index and coronary flow were monitored continuously, an arrhythmia score was used to quantify the arrhythmias during reperfusion and TTC staining was used to determine infarct size.Result:During reperfusion, compared with group A, hemodynamic values, coronary flow, arrhythmia score and infarct size were significantly improved in group B、C、E, especially in group C (P0.01 or 0.05). Conclusion:Both propofol pretreatment and ischemic preconditioning improve function of the isolated rat heart after ischemia-reperfusion injury, attenuate the reperfusion arrhythmias and reduce infarct size. Propofol pretreatment shows less protection than ischemic preconditioning and is independent of mitochondrial K ATP channels.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective:To compare the effects of propofol pretreatment and ischemic preconditioning on ischemia-reperfusion injury in the isolated rat heart and to determine whether propofol shared the same mechanism of IPC, which is related to mitochondrial K ATP channels. Method: Male rat hearts were isolated and perfused with oxygenated Krebs-Hensleit (K-H) in a Langendorff apparatus, then randomly divided into 6 groups. All isolated hearts were subjected to 30 min of no-flow global ischemia followed by 120 min reperfusion, after a treatment period consisting of no intervention after the pretreatment without (group A, n=8) or with 5-HD(100 μmol/L, group D, n=8), 10 min propofol (50 μmol/L) followed by a 10-min washout period without (group B, n=6) or with 5-HD (100 μmol/L, group E, n=6), or two times of 5 min of ischemia followed by 5 min reperfusion after the pretreatment without (group C, n=6) or with 5-HD(100 μmol/L, group F, n=7).The hemodynamic index and coronary flow were monitored continuously, an arrhythmia score was used to quantify the arrhythmias during reperfusion and TTC staining was used to determine infarct size.Result:During reperfusion, compared with group A, hemodynamic values, coronary flow, arrhythmia score and infarct size were significantly improved in group B、C、E, especially in group C (P0.01 or 0.05). Conclusion:Both propofol pretreatment and ischemic preconditioning improve function of the isolated rat heart after ischemia-reperfusion injury, attenuate the reperfusion arrhythmias and reduce infarct size. Propofol pretreatment shows less protection than ischemic preconditioning and is independent of mitochondrial K ATP channels.

Key concepts: Medicine, Propofol, Ischemia, Reperfusion injury, Hemodynamics, Anesthesia, Ischemic preconditioning, Cardiology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of effects of propofol pretreatment and ischemic preconditioning on ischemia-reperfusion injury in the isolated rat heart — Research Paper | ScholarLens