Comparison of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT in detecting liver tumors
Ruoling Han
Abstract
Ruoling Han
Abstract
Objective To compare the perfusion features of liver tumors with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced CT and evaluate their diagnostic value. Methods 92 cases of hepatic space-occupying lesions were detected with CEUS and contrast-enhanced CT respectively. Enhancement patterns and perfusion characters of liver tumors were compared in different phases. Results Using CEUS and contrast-enhanced CT, there were no significant difference in the enhancement patterns of primary liver carcinoma and hepatic hemangioma (χ2 test, P0.05). There was statistical difference in liver metastases (P0.05). Of the 30 liver malignant tumors, CEUS and contrast-enhanced CT showed 134 and 118 lesions respectively. Conclusion Both CEUS and contrast-enhanced CT could display hemodynamic characters of liver tumors sensitively. CEUS was superior to contrast-enhanced CT in detecting perfusion of micro-vascularity, especially in finding smaller lesions. So CEUS could evaluate the vascularization of liver tumors effectively and provide more information in early diagnosis of liver carcinoma.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To compare the perfusion features of liver tumors with contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced CT and evaluate their diagnostic value. Methods 92 cases of hepatic space-occupying lesions were detected with CEUS and contrast-enhanced CT respectively. Enhancement patterns and perfusion characters of liver tumors were compared in different phases. Results Using CEUS and contrast-enhanced CT, there were no significant difference in the enhancement patterns of primary liver carcinoma and hepatic hemangioma (χ2 test, P0.05). There was statistical difference in liver metastases (P0.05). Of the 30 liver malignant tumors, CEUS and contrast-enhanced CT showed 134 and 118 lesions respectively. Conclusion Both CEUS and contrast-enhanced CT could display hemodynamic characters of liver tumors sensitively. CEUS was superior to contrast-enhanced CT in detecting perfusion of micro-vascularity, especially in finding smaller lesions. So CEUS could evaluate the vascularization of liver tumors effectively and provide more information in early diagnosis of liver carcinoma.
Key concepts: Medicine, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, Vascularity, Perfusion, Ultrasound, Contrast (vision), Radiology, Liver Hemangioma