2014PubMedRequires access

[A comparative study of different sampling designs in fish community estimation].

Jing Zhao, Shouyu Zhang, Jun Lin, Xijie Zhou

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

The study of fishery community ecology depends on quality and quantity of data collected from well-designed sampling programs. The optimal sampling design must be cost-efficient, and the sampling results have been recognized as a significant factor affecting resources management. In this paper, the performances of stationary sampling, simple random sampling and stratified random sampling in estimating fish community were compared based on computer simulation by design effect (De), relative error (REE) and relative bias (RB). The results showed that, De of stationary sampling (average De was 3.37) was worse than simple random sampling and stratified random sampling (average De was 0.961). Stratified random sampling performed best among the three designs in terms of De, REE and RB. With the sample size increased, the design effect of stratified random sampling decreased but the precision and accuracy increased.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The study of fishery community ecology depends on quality and quantity of data collected from well-designed sampling programs. The optimal sampling design must be cost-efficient, and the sampling results have been recognized as a significant factor affecting resources management. In this paper, the performances of stationary sampling, simple random sampling and stratified random sampling in estimating fish community were compared based on computer simulation by design effect (De), relative error (REE) and relative bias (RB). The results showed that, De of stationary sampling (average De was 3.37) was worse than simple random sampling and stratified random sampling (average De was 0.961). Stratified random sampling performed best among the three designs in terms of De, REE and RB. With the sample size increased, the design effect of stratified random sampling decreased but the precision and accuracy increased.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The study of fishery community ecology depends on quality and quantity of data collected from well-designed sampling programs. The optimal sampling design must be cost-efficient, and the sampling results have been recognized as a significant factor affecting resources management. In this paper, the performances of stationary sampling, simple random sampling and stratified random sampling in estimating fish community were compared based on computer simulation by design effect (De), relative error (REE) and relative bias (RB). The results showed that, De of stationary sampling (average De was 3.37) was worse than simple random sampling and stratified random sampling (average De was 0.961). Stratified random sampling performed best among the three designs in terms of De, REE and RB. With the sample size increased, the design effect of stratified random sampling decreased but the precision and accuracy increased.

Key concepts: Stratified sampling, Simple random sample, Sampling (signal processing), Sampling design, Statistics, Systematic sampling, Cluster sampling, Sample size determination

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[A comparative study of different sampling designs in fish community estimation]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens