2007Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General SurgeryRequires access

Comparative study of isoflurane and sevoflurane on the effects of anesthesias in abdominal surgeries with the close-loop anesthesia system

Weifu Lei

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objectives: To study the differences between sevoflurane and isoflurane in abdomen surgery anesthetized with the target-controlled close-loop anesthesia system.Methods: Forty patients (ASA I-II) were divided into sevoflurane group (n=25) and isoflurane group (n= 15).BIS value of 55 was the control variable index.The target-controlled infusion system of sevoflurane was administered for the maintenance of anesthesia in both groups after intravenous nduction. The BIS values,blood pressures,heart rates and doses of assistant drugs were recorded and analyzed.Results: No statistical difference was observed in BIS、HR and pulse pressure in two groups. During the maintenance of anesthesia, oscillations of BIS and SBP in sevoflurane group were statistically less than those in isoflurane group (P0.05). The time to open the eyes was statistically less in sevoflurane group (P0.01). Times of restlessness showed no difference in two groups. The doses of ephedrine and Ebrantil used were not statistically different. No patients reported awareness or recall of intraoperative events. Conclusion: In abdominal surgeries, anesthesia with the closed-loop anesthesia system using sevoflurane may statistically reduce restlessness and oscillations of BIS and SBP in the maintenance of anesthesia compared with isoflurane.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives: To study the differences between sevoflurane and isoflurane in abdomen surgery anesthetized with the target-controlled close-loop anesthesia system.Methods: Forty patients (ASA I-II) were divided into sevoflurane group (n=25) and isoflurane group (n= 15).BIS value of 55 was the control variable index.The target-controlled infusion system of sevoflurane was administered for the maintenance of anesthesia in both groups after intravenous nduction. The BIS values,blood pressures,heart rates and doses of assistant drugs were recorded and analyzed.Results: No statistical difference was observed in BIS、HR and pulse pressure in two groups. During the maintenance of anesthesia, oscillations of BIS and SBP in sevoflurane group were statistically less than those in isoflurane group (P0.05). The time to open the eyes was statistically less in sevoflurane group (P0.01). Times of restlessness showed no difference in two groups. The doses of ephedrine and Ebrantil used were not statistically different. No patients reported awareness or recall of intraoperative events. Conclusion: In abdominal surgeries, anesthesia with the closed-loop anesthesia system using sevoflurane may statistically reduce restlessness and oscillations of BIS and SBP in the maintenance of anesthesia compared with isoflurane.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives: To study the differences between sevoflurane and isoflurane in abdomen surgery anesthetized with the target-controlled close-loop anesthesia system.Methods: Forty patients (ASA I-II) were divided into sevoflurane group (n=25) and isoflurane group (n= 15).BIS value of 55 was the control variable index.The target-controlled infusion system of sevoflurane was administered for the maintenance of anesthesia in both groups after intravenous nduction. The BIS values,blood pressures,heart rates and doses of assistant drugs were recorded and analyzed.Results: No statistical difference was observed in BIS、HR and pulse pressure in two groups. During the maintenance of anesthesia, oscillations of BIS and SBP in sevoflurane group were statistically less than those in isoflurane group (P0.05). The time to open the eyes was statistically less in sevoflurane group (P0.01). Times of restlessness showed no difference in two groups. The doses of ephedrine and Ebrantil used were not statistically different. No patients reported awareness or recall of intraoperative events. Conclusion: In abdominal surgeries, anesthesia with the closed-loop anesthesia system using sevoflurane may statistically reduce restlessness and oscillations of BIS and SBP in the maintenance of anesthesia compared with isoflurane.

Key concepts: Sevoflurane, Isoflurane, Medicine, Anesthesia, Ephedrine, Abdominal surgery, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of isoflurane and sevoflurane on the effects of anesthesias in abdominal surgeries with the close-loop anesthesia system — Research Paper | ScholarLens