2010•Unpublished venueRequires access

Confucian Traditions in Modern East Asia: Their Destinies and Prospects

Ming-huei Lee

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

In the past, China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam together formed a “Confucian Cultural Sphere.” In addition, because of the immigration of the Chinese, Confucian culture constitutes an essential part of the cultures of Singapore and Malaysia. Although the modern fate of Confucian traditions in these countries has been somewhat different, they were faced with common problems, such as the challenge from the West, the pursuit of modernization, and the collapse of traditional systems, among others. The most significant commonality was, perhaps, the eclipse of Confucianism as a national ideology. This paper will argue that after East Asia’s entry into the modern world, the restoration of Confucian traditions to the status of national ideology, as Jiang Qing wishes, is impossible. Nevertheless, Confucian traditions can still function as one of the main resources for cultural “Bildung.” Moreover, Confucianism should not retreat into the realm of “inner sagehood (nei sheng ),” as Yu Ying-shih (Yu Yingshi ) suggests, since Confucianism is characterized by the connectedness of “inner sagehood” and “outer kingliness (wai wang ).” In the 21st century, Confucianism should develop a modern system of ethics as well as theories of cultural, political, and social criticism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the past, China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam together formed a “Confucian Cultural Sphere.” In addition, because of the immigration of the Chinese, Confucian culture constitutes an essential part of the cultures of Singapore and Malaysia. Although the modern fate of Confucian traditions in these countries has been somewhat different, they were faced with common problems, such as the challenge from the West, the pursuit of modernization, and the collapse of traditional systems, among others. The most significant commonality was, perhaps, the eclipse of Confucianism as a national ideology. This paper will argue that after East Asia’s entry into the modern world, the restoration of Confucian traditions to the status of national ideology, as Jiang Qing wishes, is impossible. Nevertheless, Confucian traditions can still function as one of the main resources for cultural “Bildung.” Moreover, Confucianism should not retreat into the realm of “inner sagehood (nei sheng ),” as Yu Ying-shih (Yu Yingshi ) suggests, since Confucianism is characterized by the connectedness of “inner sagehood” and “outer kingliness (wai wang ).” In the 21st century, Confucianism should develop a modern system of ethics as well as theories of cultural, political, and social criticism.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the past, China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam together formed a “Confucian Cultural Sphere.” In addition, because of the immigration of the Chinese, Confucian culture constitutes an essential part of the cultures of Singapore and Malaysia. Although the modern fate of Confucian traditions in these countries has been somewhat different, they were faced with common problems, such as the challenge from the West, the pursuit of modernization, and the collapse of traditional systems, among others. The most significant commonality was, perhaps, the eclipse of Confucianism as a national ideology. This paper will argue that after East Asia’s entry into the modern world, the restoration of Confucian traditions to the status of national ideology, as Jiang Qing wishes, is impossible. Nevertheless, Confucian traditions can still function as one of the main resources for cultural “Bildung.” Moreover, Confucianism should not retreat into the realm of “inner sagehood (nei sheng ),” as Yu Ying-shih (Yu Yingshi ) suggests, since Confucianism is characterized by the connectedness of “inner sagehood” and “outer kingliness (wai wang ).” In the 21st century, Confucianism should develop a modern system of ethics as well as theories of cultural, political, and social criticism.

Key concepts: Ideology, China, Modernization theory, Politics, Realm, Territorial integrity, East Asia, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Confucian Traditions in Modern East Asia: Their Destinies and Prospects — Research Paper | ScholarLens