2005•Journal of Tropical MedicineRequires access

Clinical and Pathological Analysis of Chronic Viral Hepatitis

Xie Shi-bin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the characteristics of clinical diagnosis and pathological diagnosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Methods The liver biopsy was performed in 248 patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Clinical diagnosis and the pathological diagnosis of these patients were made respectively according the criteria of chronic hepatitis diagnosis. Results The clinical diagnosis was coincided with the pathological diagnosis in 90.7% patients with mild chronic viral hepatitis light, in 76.6% patients with moderate chronic viral hepatitis, in 80.8% patients with liver cirrhosis, and in 78.6% of all the patients with chronic hepatitis. Conclusion The clinical diagnosis criteria of chronic hepatitis are useful, but the error rate is nearly 20%, compared with the pathological diagnosis. The accurate diagnosis should be made by combining clinical and pathological diagnosis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the characteristics of clinical diagnosis and pathological diagnosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Methods The liver biopsy was performed in 248 patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Clinical diagnosis and the pathological diagnosis of these patients were made respectively according the criteria of chronic hepatitis diagnosis. Results The clinical diagnosis was coincided with the pathological diagnosis in 90.7% patients with mild chronic viral hepatitis light, in 76.6% patients with moderate chronic viral hepatitis, in 80.8% patients with liver cirrhosis, and in 78.6% of all the patients with chronic hepatitis. Conclusion The clinical diagnosis criteria of chronic hepatitis are useful, but the error rate is nearly 20%, compared with the pathological diagnosis. The accurate diagnosis should be made by combining clinical and pathological diagnosis.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the characteristics of clinical diagnosis and pathological diagnosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Methods The liver biopsy was performed in 248 patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Clinical diagnosis and the pathological diagnosis of these patients were made respectively according the criteria of chronic hepatitis diagnosis. Results The clinical diagnosis was coincided with the pathological diagnosis in 90.7% patients with mild chronic viral hepatitis light, in 76.6% patients with moderate chronic viral hepatitis, in 80.8% patients with liver cirrhosis, and in 78.6% of all the patients with chronic hepatitis. Conclusion The clinical diagnosis criteria of chronic hepatitis are useful, but the error rate is nearly 20%, compared with the pathological diagnosis. The accurate diagnosis should be made by combining clinical and pathological diagnosis.

Key concepts: Medicine, Pathological, Viral hepatitis, Cirrhosis, Liver biopsy, Chronic hepatitis, Hepatitis, Clinical diagnosis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical and Pathological Analysis of Chronic Viral Hepatitis — Research Paper | ScholarLens