2006Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical RemediesRequires access

Bioequivalence between two kinds of amlodipine besilate tablets in healthy volunteers

Gao Xiao-hua

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

AIM: To study the bioequivalence between two kinds of amlodipine besilate tablet formulations in healthy human body. METHODS: Eighteen healthy Chinese male volunteers were included in a randomized, cross-over design. All subjects were administered individually a single 10 mg oral dose of each formulation separated by a 14-day washout period. Plasma amlodipine levels were determined by LC/MS/MS assay. The bioavailability and bioequivalence of the formulations were evaluated. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of the test and reference tablets were as follows: tmax were (8.9±s 2.5) and (8.2±2.2) h; cmax were (5.1±2.3) and (5.0±2.2)μg·L-1; t1/2 were (45±10) and (49±24) h; AUC0-t were (191±69) and (196±53)μg·h·L-1; AUC0-∞, were (225±79) and (243±89)μg·h·L-1 respectively. The relative bioavailability of the test tablets was (99±23) %. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the two formulations having bioequivalence with each other in healthy human body.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

AIM: To study the bioequivalence between two kinds of amlodipine besilate tablet formulations in healthy human body. METHODS: Eighteen healthy Chinese male volunteers were included in a randomized, cross-over design. All subjects were administered individually a single 10 mg oral dose of each formulation separated by a 14-day washout period. Plasma amlodipine levels were determined by LC/MS/MS assay. The bioavailability and bioequivalence of the formulations were evaluated. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of the test and reference tablets were as follows: tmax were (8.9±s 2.5) and (8.2±2.2) h; cmax were (5.1±2.3) and (5.0±2.2)μg·L-1; t1/2 were (45±10) and (49±24) h; AUC0-t were (191±69) and (196±53)μg·h·L-1; AUC0-∞, were (225±79) and (243±89)μg·h·L-1 respectively. The relative bioavailability of the test tablets was (99±23) %. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the two formulations having bioequivalence with each other in healthy human body.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

AIM: To study the bioequivalence between two kinds of amlodipine besilate tablet formulations in healthy human body. METHODS: Eighteen healthy Chinese male volunteers were included in a randomized, cross-over design. All subjects were administered individually a single 10 mg oral dose of each formulation separated by a 14-day washout period. Plasma amlodipine levels were determined by LC/MS/MS assay. The bioavailability and bioequivalence of the formulations were evaluated. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters of the test and reference tablets were as follows: tmax were (8.9±s 2.5) and (8.2±2.2) h; cmax were (5.1±2.3) and (5.0±2.2)μg·L-1; t1/2 were (45±10) and (49±24) h; AUC0-t were (191±69) and (196±53)μg·h·L-1; AUC0-∞, were (225±79) and (243±89)μg·h·L-1 respectively. The relative bioavailability of the test tablets was (99±23) %. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the two formulations having bioequivalence with each other in healthy human body.

Key concepts: Bioequivalence, Bioavailability, Cmax, Pharmacokinetics, Amlodipine, Pharmacology, Medicine, Crossover study

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioequivalence between two kinds of amlodipine besilate tablets in healthy volunteers — Research Paper | ScholarLens