2012•Guide of China MedicineRequires access

Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy between Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheotomy and Conventional Tracheotomy

MA Zu-guo

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To evaluate comparatively the clinical efficacy of percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy(PDT) and conventional tracheotomy for critically illpatients in ICU.Methods 104 patients with tracheotomy in ICU were selected and divided them into two groups.As control group contains 48 patients underwent conventional tracheotomy and observation group has 56 patients received PDT.The mean time used for the operations,complications,and safety were compared between the two methods.Results The operation-related complications in observation group were less than control group(P0.05),and has shorter operation time,incision length,recovery time and bleeding(P0.05).Conclusion PDT has much characteristics as safety,easy to operate,with less time and complications.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To evaluate comparatively the clinical efficacy of percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy(PDT) and conventional tracheotomy for critically illpatients in ICU.Methods 104 patients with tracheotomy in ICU were selected and divided them into two groups.As control group contains 48 patients underwent conventional tracheotomy and observation group has 56 patients received PDT.The mean time used for the operations,complications,and safety were compared between the two methods.Results The operation-related complications in observation group were less than control group(P0.05),and has shorter operation time,incision length,recovery time and bleeding(P0.05).Conclusion PDT has much characteristics as safety,easy to operate,with less time and complications.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To evaluate comparatively the clinical efficacy of percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy(PDT) and conventional tracheotomy for critically illpatients in ICU.Methods 104 patients with tracheotomy in ICU were selected and divided them into two groups.As control group contains 48 patients underwent conventional tracheotomy and observation group has 56 patients received PDT.The mean time used for the operations,complications,and safety were compared between the two methods.Results The operation-related complications in observation group were less than control group(P0.05),and has shorter operation time,incision length,recovery time and bleeding(P0.05).Conclusion PDT has much characteristics as safety,easy to operate,with less time and complications.

Key concepts: Tracheotomy, Medicine, Percutaneous, Surgery, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy between Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheotomy and Conventional Tracheotomy — Research Paper | ScholarLens