2006•Journal of Shaanxi Normal UniversityRequires access

A View of the General Trend and Potential of Neo-Confucianism in Terms of the Humanics in the Song and the Ming Dynasty

Ding Wei-xiang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The theory of double human nature was creatively contributed by Zhang Zai who tried to correct the partialities both in Buddhism and Taoism and Confucianism in the Han and the Tang Dynasty. Since the Luo School, the approach of moral practice represented by Cheng Jing and that of investigation and analysis started to gain popularity in the field of Chinese philosophy. Hence the argument between Zhu Xi and the Cheng brothers. From the Yuan to the Ming Dynasty, the Xin school reached the pinnacle of moral practice by combining the two approaches, but it simply neglected the objective world in its observation whereas the Qi school advocated intellectual retionale and pursuit but was on the brink of marginalizing moral concern. Therefore, maintaining the agreement between the two approaches and avoiding their partialities is both potential of development of Neo-Confucianism in the Song and the Ming Dynasty and internal dynamo to absorb western culture and reestablish Chinese culture.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The theory of double human nature was creatively contributed by Zhang Zai who tried to correct the partialities both in Buddhism and Taoism and Confucianism in the Han and the Tang Dynasty. Since the Luo School, the approach of moral practice represented by Cheng Jing and that of investigation and analysis started to gain popularity in the field of Chinese philosophy. Hence the argument between Zhu Xi and the Cheng brothers. From the Yuan to the Ming Dynasty, the Xin school reached the pinnacle of moral practice by combining the two approaches, but it simply neglected the objective world in its observation whereas the Qi school advocated intellectual retionale and pursuit but was on the brink of marginalizing moral concern. Therefore, maintaining the agreement between the two approaches and avoiding their partialities is both potential of development of Neo-Confucianism in the Song and the Ming Dynasty and internal dynamo to absorb western culture and reestablish Chinese culture.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The theory of double human nature was creatively contributed by Zhang Zai who tried to correct the partialities both in Buddhism and Taoism and Confucianism in the Han and the Tang Dynasty. Since the Luo School, the approach of moral practice represented by Cheng Jing and that of investigation and analysis started to gain popularity in the field of Chinese philosophy. Hence the argument between Zhu Xi and the Cheng brothers. From the Yuan to the Ming Dynasty, the Xin school reached the pinnacle of moral practice by combining the two approaches, but it simply neglected the objective world in its observation whereas the Qi school advocated intellectual retionale and pursuit but was on the brink of marginalizing moral concern. Therefore, maintaining the agreement between the two approaches and avoiding their partialities is both potential of development of Neo-Confucianism in the Song and the Ming Dynasty and internal dynamo to absorb western culture and reestablish Chinese culture.

Key concepts: Taoism, Neo-Confucianism, Buddhism, Chinese philosophy, Popularity, Zhàng, Philosophy, China

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A View of the General Trend and Potential of Neo-Confucianism in Terms of the Humanics in the Song and the Ming Dynasty — Research Paper | ScholarLens