1989•Unpublished venueRequires access

THE SELECTION OF OPERATION TYPES FOR PATIENTS WITH STAGE I AND II GASTRIC CARCINOMA

Zhu Shao

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

From Apr. 1964 to Dec. 1982, one hundred and twenty nine patients win stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ gastric carcinoma underwent two different operation types, at our hospital. A-mong the 14 patien ts in stage Ⅰ . 8 cases underwent R 2 radical gastrectomy, 6 cases underwent subtotal gastrectomy. Their 5- and 10-year survival rates were similar Among the 115 cases in stage Ⅱ 64 cases underwent R 2 operation and 51 cases subtotal gastrectomy. Their 5-year survival rates were similar. However, the 10-year survival rate was somewhat higher in the R 2 group than that in the subtotal gastrectomy group . According to the infiltrating extent of the tumor and metastases of the regional lymph nodss, it seems that the subtotal gastrectomy is reasonable theoretically for stage Ⅰ cases, because there is no metastatic lymph nodes in these patien ts, However, for there patients R 1 radical operation should be chosen in clinical practice, because we could not judge macroscopically whether the lymph nodges are affected. In clinical practice , for the same recason , we could not differ entiate stage Ⅱ with stage, Ⅲ gastric carcinoma. Once the gastric carcinoma is determined clinically to be stage Ⅱ, we prefer to perform R 2 or selective R 3 operation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

From Apr. 1964 to Dec. 1982, one hundred and twenty nine patients win stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ gastric carcinoma underwent two different operation types, at our hospital. A-mong the 14 patien ts in stage Ⅰ . 8 cases underwent R 2 radical gastrectomy, 6 cases underwent subtotal gastrectomy. Their 5- and 10-year survival rates were similar Among the 115 cases in stage Ⅱ 64 cases underwent R 2 operation and 51 cases subtotal gastrectomy. Their 5-year survival rates were similar. However, the 10-year survival rate was somewhat higher in the R 2 group than that in the subtotal gastrectomy group . According to the infiltrating extent of the tumor and metastases of the regional lymph nodss, it seems that the subtotal gastrectomy is reasonable theoretically for stage Ⅰ cases, because there is no metastatic lymph nodes in these patien ts, However, for there patients R 1 radical operation should be chosen in clinical practice, because we could not judge macroscopically whether the lymph nodges are affected. In clinical practice , for the same recason , we could not differ entiate stage Ⅱ with stage, Ⅲ gastric carcinoma. Once the gastric carcinoma is determined clinically to be stage Ⅱ, we prefer to perform R 2 or selective R 3 operation.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

From Apr. 1964 to Dec. 1982, one hundred and twenty nine patients win stage Ⅰ and Ⅱ gastric carcinoma underwent two different operation types, at our hospital. A-mong the 14 patien ts in stage Ⅰ . 8 cases underwent R 2 radical gastrectomy, 6 cases underwent subtotal gastrectomy. Their 5- and 10-year survival rates were similar Among the 115 cases in stage Ⅱ 64 cases underwent R 2 operation and 51 cases subtotal gastrectomy. Their 5-year survival rates were similar. However, the 10-year survival rate was somewhat higher in the R 2 group than that in the subtotal gastrectomy group . According to the infiltrating extent of the tumor and metastases of the regional lymph nodss, it seems that the subtotal gastrectomy is reasonable theoretically for stage Ⅰ cases, because there is no metastatic lymph nodes in these patien ts, However, for there patients R 1 radical operation should be chosen in clinical practice, because we could not judge macroscopically whether the lymph nodges are affected. In clinical practice , for the same recason , we could not differ entiate stage Ⅱ with stage, Ⅲ gastric carcinoma. Once the gastric carcinoma is determined clinically to be stage Ⅱ, we prefer to perform R 2 or selective R 3 operation.

Key concepts: Gastrectomy, Medicine, Gastric carcinoma, Stage (stratigraphy), Lymph, Surgery, Survival rate, Cancer

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE SELECTION OF OPERATION TYPES FOR PATIENTS WITH STAGE I AND II GASTRIC CARCINOMA — Research Paper | ScholarLens