Research on General Principles of Chinese Economic Law in Thirty Years:A Perspective of Keywords
Bi Guan
Abstract
Bi Guan
Abstract
As a modern law,the lacks pain from conflicts between modernization and tradition.The is widely open and strongly absorbtive for new conceptions and theories,thus it is available to find a convincing support from modern theories and practice.The research indicates that,in specific context of China,in which traditionalism,modernism and post-modernism exist synchronically,the general theories of stress on three pairs of key words,namely,market and government,economy and law,private and public refers to not only the concerning economy,but also specific economic law.In a serious study on law,various challenges should be overcome,such as Chinese-mode market and government,economy and law,nation and society,technology and finance;and research focuses should be laid on interdisciplinary sections between private and public law,economics and policies,economic administration and administrative policies,and traditionalism and modernism.The should be specified as an academic discipline rather than a section of law,further,jurisprudence of should transfer from narrow-sense law to broad-sense law.The role transition from to negation helps to settle issue that what is direction of jurisprudence of Chinese law,to better face real problem of China's society,and to initiate constructive dialogues with most advanced jurisprudence of in western countries.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
As a modern law,the lacks pain from conflicts between modernization and tradition.The is widely open and strongly absorbtive for new conceptions and theories,thus it is available to find a convincing support from modern theories and practice.The research indicates that,in specific context of China,in which traditionalism,modernism and post-modernism exist synchronically,the general theories of stress on three pairs of key words,namely,market and government,economy and law,private and public refers to not only the concerning economy,but also specific economic law.In a serious study on law,various challenges should be overcome,such as Chinese-mode market and government,economy and law,nation and society,technology and finance;and research focuses should be laid on interdisciplinary sections between private and public law,economics and policies,economic administration and administrative policies,and traditionalism and modernism.The should be specified as an academic discipline rather than a section of law,further,jurisprudence of should transfer from narrow-sense law to broad-sense law.The role transition from to negation helps to settle issue that what is direction of jurisprudence of Chinese law,to better face real problem of China's society,and to initiate constructive dialogues with most advanced jurisprudence of in western countries.
Key concepts: Jurisprudence, Public law, Law, Chinese law, Comparative law, Philosophy of law, Economic law, Modernization theory