The Object of Maritime Lien
Ying Sun
Abstract
Ying Sun
Abstract
The paper discusses that whether the object of maritime lien should belong to the debtor.The author holds that the cargo stipulated in the maritime law should be interpreted as the transported cargo.As to the maritime lien in the non-vessel operation,the author believes that both of the nonvessel common carrier and the actual carrier should have the maritime lien right.Finally the author holds that it is not feasible to interpret the actual carrier's maritime lien by obtainment in due course.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The paper discusses that whether the object of maritime lien should belong to the debtor.The author holds that the cargo stipulated in the maritime law should be interpreted as the transported cargo.As to the maritime lien in the non-vessel operation,the author believes that both of the nonvessel common carrier and the actual carrier should have the maritime lien right.Finally the author holds that it is not feasible to interpret the actual carrier's maritime lien by obtainment in due course.
Key concepts: Lien, Debtor, Object (grammar), Law, Computer science, Engineering, Operations research, Business