2001Journal of Faian Institute of EducationRequires access

Thought on the discipline building of the learning of Mount Tai

Song Shao-xiang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Mount Tai exists objectively while the learning of Mount Tai is formed artificially,Mount Tai is not the learning of Mount Tai while the study of Mount Tai can not substitute the study of the learning of Mout Tai.Now that there exists such a grand and extensive Mount Tai,there must be reason for itsexistence.This reason is the inner real logical relations,characteristics and laws of its forming and development of the existence.Through the efforts of generations of scholars and their constant discoveries to its mysteries,a systematic recognition has been formed gradually which is the learning about Mount Tai externalized with the academic terms,concepts and systems of principles.The learning of Mount Tai has many sub-branches which is a comprehensive discipline crossing the arts and science and infiltrating other subjects.It is a humane studies mainly but involving natural science at the meantine.To build up the learning of Mount Tai,it is worth while for the scholars at home and abroad to make pain staking efforts.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Mount Tai exists objectively while the learning of Mount Tai is formed artificially,Mount Tai is not the learning of Mount Tai while the study of Mount Tai can not substitute the study of the learning of Mout Tai.Now that there exists such a grand and extensive Mount Tai,there must be reason for itsexistence.This reason is the inner real logical relations,characteristics and laws of its forming and development of the existence.Through the efforts of generations of scholars and their constant discoveries to its mysteries,a systematic recognition has been formed gradually which is the learning about Mount Tai externalized with the academic terms,concepts and systems of principles.The learning of Mount Tai has many sub-branches which is a comprehensive discipline crossing the arts and science and infiltrating other subjects.It is a humane studies mainly but involving natural science at the meantine.To build up the learning of Mount Tai,it is worth while for the scholars at home and abroad to make pain staking efforts.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Mount Tai exists objectively while the learning of Mount Tai is formed artificially,Mount Tai is not the learning of Mount Tai while the study of Mount Tai can not substitute the study of the learning of Mout Tai.Now that there exists such a grand and extensive Mount Tai,there must be reason for itsexistence.This reason is the inner real logical relations,characteristics and laws of its forming and development of the existence.Through the efforts of generations of scholars and their constant discoveries to its mysteries,a systematic recognition has been formed gradually which is the learning about Mount Tai externalized with the academic terms,concepts and systems of principles.The learning of Mount Tai has many sub-branches which is a comprehensive discipline crossing the arts and science and infiltrating other subjects.It is a humane studies mainly but involving natural science at the meantine.To build up the learning of Mount Tai,it is worth while for the scholars at home and abroad to make pain staking efforts.

Key concepts: Mount, Psychology, Natural (archaeology), History, Engineering, Archaeology, Mechanical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Thought on the discipline building of the learning of Mount Tai — Research Paper | ScholarLens