2005Clinical Medical Journal of ChinaRequires access

Comparison of Azithromycin versus Cefixime for Treatment of Bacterial Diarrhea in Children.

Caoi Hongwei

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of azithromycin and cefixime in the treatment of acute bacterial invasive diarrhea in children. Methods: From Jul. 2004 to Nov. 2004, 121 evaluable children ,ages 4 months to 12 years old presenting with acute bacterial diarrhea were randomized to receive either azithromycin (10 mg/kg/day, once a day;n= 64) or cefixime (5-8 mg/kg/day,twice a day; n = 57). Clinical response were assessed on days 3. Results: Clinical cure or improvement was observed in 98.44% and 96.49% of the azithromycin and cefixime groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups(X2 = 0.472,P0.05). Conclusion: Oral azithromycin was safe and effective for the empiric treatment of acute invasive diarrhea in pediatric patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of azithromycin and cefixime in the treatment of acute bacterial invasive diarrhea in children. Methods: From Jul. 2004 to Nov. 2004, 121 evaluable children ,ages 4 months to 12 years old presenting with acute bacterial diarrhea were randomized to receive either azithromycin (10 mg/kg/day, once a day;n= 64) or cefixime (5-8 mg/kg/day,twice a day; n = 57). Clinical response were assessed on days 3. Results: Clinical cure or improvement was observed in 98.44% and 96.49% of the azithromycin and cefixime groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups(X2 = 0.472,P0.05). Conclusion: Oral azithromycin was safe and effective for the empiric treatment of acute invasive diarrhea in pediatric patients.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of azithromycin and cefixime in the treatment of acute bacterial invasive diarrhea in children. Methods: From Jul. 2004 to Nov. 2004, 121 evaluable children ,ages 4 months to 12 years old presenting with acute bacterial diarrhea were randomized to receive either azithromycin (10 mg/kg/day, once a day;n= 64) or cefixime (5-8 mg/kg/day,twice a day; n = 57). Clinical response were assessed on days 3. Results: Clinical cure or improvement was observed in 98.44% and 96.49% of the azithromycin and cefixime groups, respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups(X2 = 0.472,P0.05). Conclusion: Oral azithromycin was safe and effective for the empiric treatment of acute invasive diarrhea in pediatric patients.

Key concepts: Cefixime, Azithromycin, Medicine, Diarrhea, Acute diarrhea, Internal medicine, Gastroenterology, Antibiotics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Azithromycin versus Cefixime for Treatment of Bacterial Diarrhea in Children. — Research Paper | ScholarLens