Evaluation of Ascending Aortic Dilation in Patients with Functionally Normal and Stenotic Bicuspid Aortic Valves by Echocardiography
Chun Ma
Abstract
Chun Ma
Abstract
Objective To determine whether the ascending aortic dilation associated with a bicuspid aortic valve occurs independently of valvular hemodynamic abnormality. Methods Aortic dimensions were measured by two echocardiography in 79 subjects with a functionally normal ( n =42) or stenotic ( n =37) bicuspid aortic valve and compared with the findings in 40 normal subjects matched for age, body surface area and artery pressure. Ascending aortic measurements were made at four levels: annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, supra aortic ridge, and proximal ascending aorta. Results The dimensions of the ascending aorta in subjects with a bicuspid aortic valve were larger than in controls at three levels:sinuses of Valsalva, supra aortic ridge, and proximal ascending aorta ( P 0.05 to P 0.001). There were 18 subjects had ascending aortic dimensions comparable with controls, while 24 had definitely abnormal ascending aortic dimensions in 42 subjects with a functionally normal bicuspid aortic valve. Conclusion There was a high prevalence of ascending aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. These findings support the hypothesis that bicuspid aortic valve and ascending aortic dilation may reflect a common developmental defect.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To determine whether the ascending aortic dilation associated with a bicuspid aortic valve occurs independently of valvular hemodynamic abnormality. Methods Aortic dimensions were measured by two echocardiography in 79 subjects with a functionally normal ( n =42) or stenotic ( n =37) bicuspid aortic valve and compared with the findings in 40 normal subjects matched for age, body surface area and artery pressure. Ascending aortic measurements were made at four levels: annulus, sinuses of Valsalva, supra aortic ridge, and proximal ascending aorta. Results The dimensions of the ascending aorta in subjects with a bicuspid aortic valve were larger than in controls at three levels:sinuses of Valsalva, supra aortic ridge, and proximal ascending aorta ( P 0.05 to P 0.001). There were 18 subjects had ascending aortic dimensions comparable with controls, while 24 had definitely abnormal ascending aortic dimensions in 42 subjects with a functionally normal bicuspid aortic valve. Conclusion There was a high prevalence of ascending aortic dilatation in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. These findings support the hypothesis that bicuspid aortic valve and ascending aortic dilation may reflect a common developmental defect.
Key concepts: Bicuspid aortic valve, Ascending aorta, Medicine, Cardiology, Internal medicine, Aortic valve, Aorta, Cardiac skeleton