Escitalopram versus Citalopram for Patients with Depressive Disorder
Shang Yue-jiao
Abstract
Shang Yue-jiao
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:To discuss the efficacy and safety of Escitalopram in the treatment of patients with depressive disorder. METHODS: A total of 68 outpatients who were diagnosed as having depression based on CCMD-3 criteria were randomly assigned to receive escitalopram 10~20 mg·d~ -1 (n=34) or citalopram 20~50 mg·d~ -1 (n=34). Clinical efficacy was evaluated using HAMD and HAMA, and adverse reactions and safety were assessed with TESS and laboratory examination. The two groups were followed for 6 weeks. RESULTS: The effective rate was 70.6% and the cure rate was and 47. 1% for Escitalopram group versus 61.8% and 41.2% respectively for citalopram group, showing no significant differences between two groups. The main ADRs in Escitalopram-treated group were lack of appetite (11.8%), nausea (8.8%), dizziness (5.9%), and dry mouth (5.9%), nonsignificant as compared with Citalopram-treated group. The expulsion rate and the rate of loss of follow-up were 11.8% and 14.7%, respectively, showing no significance. CONCLUSION: Escitalopram is safe and effective for patients with depressive disorder, and its curative efficacy is similar to Citalopram but it has more rapid onset of drug effect than the latter.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
OBJECTIVE:To discuss the efficacy and safety of Escitalopram in the treatment of patients with depressive disorder. METHODS: A total of 68 outpatients who were diagnosed as having depression based on CCMD-3 criteria were randomly assigned to receive escitalopram 10~20 mg·d~ -1 (n=34) or citalopram 20~50 mg·d~ -1 (n=34). Clinical efficacy was evaluated using HAMD and HAMA, and adverse reactions and safety were assessed with TESS and laboratory examination. The two groups were followed for 6 weeks. RESULTS: The effective rate was 70.6% and the cure rate was and 47. 1% for Escitalopram group versus 61.8% and 41.2% respectively for citalopram group, showing no significant differences between two groups. The main ADRs in Escitalopram-treated group were lack of appetite (11.8%), nausea (8.8%), dizziness (5.9%), and dry mouth (5.9%), nonsignificant as compared with Citalopram-treated group. The expulsion rate and the rate of loss of follow-up were 11.8% and 14.7%, respectively, showing no significance. CONCLUSION: Escitalopram is safe and effective for patients with depressive disorder, and its curative efficacy is similar to Citalopram but it has more rapid onset of drug effect than the latter.
Key concepts: Escitalopram, Citalopram, Hamd, Nausea, Depression (economics), Internal medicine, Major depressive disorder, Medicine