2008Engineering MechanicsRequires access

ASEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MULTISTORY FRAMES BASED ON DIFFERENT BRACES DESIGN METHODS

Gen-Shu Tong

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

Braced frames are designed in two different philosophies: one is to amplify design force of braces to achieve a strong-shear frame, the other does not. This paper analyzed the nonlinear elastic-plastic time-history responses of these two types of frames under 4 earthquake records. It was found that: 1) columns in strong-shear braced frames buckle in a non-sway mode before yielding of braces, and then horizontal and vertical displacements of the frames increase rapidly. The deformation of a weak-shear braced frame is in a sway mode. 2) curves of inter-story shear force-lateral displacement and the stress-strain response of the brace and columns do not form a hysteretic loop in a strong-shear braced frame, energy-dissipating capacity is unable to be developed to reduce the earthquake response. 3) In weak-shear braced frames, braces yield first, then the brace and the frame may hysteretically deform laterally and continually to develop their ductility and energy-dissipating capacity to reduce earthquake responses, the frame comprising part of the bracing system functions as a secondary structural system against earthquake. Based on these findings, it is suggested that check be carried out to make sure that the brace in the weakest story yields before the connecting columns buckle in a non-sway mode, i.e. to ensure a strong-column weak-brace system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Braced frames are designed in two different philosophies: one is to amplify design force of braces to achieve a strong-shear frame, the other does not. This paper analyzed the nonlinear elastic-plastic time-history responses of these two types of frames under 4 earthquake records. It was found that: 1) columns in strong-shear braced frames buckle in a non-sway mode before yielding of braces, and then horizontal and vertical displacements of the frames increase rapidly. The deformation of a weak-shear braced frame is in a sway mode. 2) curves of inter-story shear force-lateral displacement and the stress-strain response of the brace and columns do not form a hysteretic loop in a strong-shear braced frame, energy-dissipating capacity is unable to be developed to reduce the earthquake response. 3) In weak-shear braced frames, braces yield first, then the brace and the frame may hysteretically deform laterally and continually to develop their ductility and energy-dissipating capacity to reduce earthquake responses, the frame comprising part of the bracing system functions as a secondary structural system against earthquake. Based on these findings, it is suggested that check be carried out to make sure that the brace in the weakest story yields before the connecting columns buckle in a non-sway mode, i.e. to ensure a strong-column weak-brace system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Braced frames are designed in two different philosophies: one is to amplify design force of braces to achieve a strong-shear frame, the other does not. This paper analyzed the nonlinear elastic-plastic time-history responses of these two types of frames under 4 earthquake records. It was found that: 1) columns in strong-shear braced frames buckle in a non-sway mode before yielding of braces, and then horizontal and vertical displacements of the frames increase rapidly. The deformation of a weak-shear braced frame is in a sway mode. 2) curves of inter-story shear force-lateral displacement and the stress-strain response of the brace and columns do not form a hysteretic loop in a strong-shear braced frame, energy-dissipating capacity is unable to be developed to reduce the earthquake response. 3) In weak-shear braced frames, braces yield first, then the brace and the frame may hysteretically deform laterally and continually to develop their ductility and energy-dissipating capacity to reduce earthquake responses, the frame comprising part of the bracing system functions as a secondary structural system against earthquake. Based on these findings, it is suggested that check be carried out to make sure that the brace in the weakest story yields before the connecting columns buckle in a non-sway mode, i.e. to ensure a strong-column weak-brace system.

Key concepts: Brace, Structural engineering, Bracing, Braced frame, Buckle, Engineering, Shear force, Shear (geology)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ASEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF MULTISTORY FRAMES BASED ON DIFFERENT BRACES DESIGN METHODS — Research Paper | ScholarLens