2010•The Journal of Clinical AnesthesiologyRequires access

Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with Shikani optical stylet through the left molar approach and Macintosh direct laryngoscope

Zhao Shi-bin

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objective To compare the hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation using Shikani optical stylet(SOS)and a Macintosh direct laryngoscope(MDLS).Methods Forty patients scheduled for selective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to either group S or group M. Invasive blood pressure and HR were recorded before anesthesia induction(T0),after induction(T1),immediately after intubation(T2) and at 1 min(T3),3 min(T4),5 min(T5) after intubation. The intubation duration was recorded,and rate-pressure product(RPP)was calculated.Results After induction,BP and RPP in both groups decreased significantly (P0.05). Compared with T1,BP and RPP at T2,T3 and HR at T2-T5 increased significantly (P0.05). At T2,SBP in group M was higher than that in group S(P0.05).Except for this,no significant difference was detected between two groups. In group M,the time required for the maximum values of HR was significantly delayed compared with that in group S. The incidence of SBP more than 30% of the baseline and RPP more than 22 000 in two groups was not significantly different. There was no significant difference in intubation duration.Conclusion Orotracheal intubation with SOS via left molar approach can be performed effectively less with less hemodynamic response.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objective To compare the hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation using Shikani optical stylet(SOS)and a Macintosh direct laryngoscope(MDLS).Methods Forty patients scheduled for selective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to either group S or group M. Invasive blood pressure and HR were recorded before anesthesia induction(T0),after induction(T1),immediately after intubation(T2) and at 1 min(T3),3 min(T4),5 min(T5) after intubation. The intubation duration was recorded,and rate-pressure product(RPP)was calculated.Results After induction,BP and RPP in both groups decreased significantly (P0.05). Compared with T1,BP and RPP at T2,T3 and HR at T2-T5 increased significantly (P0.05). At T2,SBP in group M was higher than that in group S(P0.05).Except for this,no significant difference was detected between two groups. In group M,the time required for the maximum values of HR was significantly delayed compared with that in group S. The incidence of SBP more than 30% of the baseline and RPP more than 22 000 in two groups was not significantly different. There was no significant difference in intubation duration.Conclusion Orotracheal intubation with SOS via left molar approach can be performed effectively less with less hemodynamic response.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objective To compare the hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation using Shikani optical stylet(SOS)and a Macintosh direct laryngoscope(MDLS).Methods Forty patients scheduled for selective surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated to either group S or group M. Invasive blood pressure and HR were recorded before anesthesia induction(T0),after induction(T1),immediately after intubation(T2) and at 1 min(T3),3 min(T4),5 min(T5) after intubation. The intubation duration was recorded,and rate-pressure product(RPP)was calculated.Results After induction,BP and RPP in both groups decreased significantly (P0.05). Compared with T1,BP and RPP at T2,T3 and HR at T2-T5 increased significantly (P0.05). At T2,SBP in group M was higher than that in group S(P0.05).Except for this,no significant difference was detected between two groups. In group M,the time required for the maximum values of HR was significantly delayed compared with that in group S. The incidence of SBP more than 30% of the baseline and RPP more than 22 000 in two groups was not significantly different. There was no significant difference in intubation duration.Conclusion Orotracheal intubation with SOS via left molar approach can be performed effectively less with less hemodynamic response.

Key concepts: Orotracheal intubation, Medicine, Intubation, Anesthesia, Hemodynamics, Stylet, Molar, Heart rate

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with Shikani optical stylet through the left molar approach and Macintosh direct laryngoscope — Research Paper | ScholarLens